JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Over 1,000 left homeless after BMC razes shanties in Govandi, residents say no notice served

Reported by

Shubham Kothari

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Published on

March 20, 2024

March 21, 2024

Edited on

March 20, 2024

State

Maharashtra

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

1000

Households Affected by Conflict

200

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Govandi

Mumbai Suburban

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)

Land Conflict Summary

Over 1,000 people were rendered homeless after the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) demolished about 200 structures on 6 and 7 February, 2024, in Panchsheel Nagar slum in Govandi, in Mumbai suburb, without prior notice.

Residents along with activists of Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti resisted the demolitions, which were carried out in haste, barely allowing them to collect their documents and belongings.

Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti members alleged that the police lathicharged the residents trying to individually resist the eviction from their household. The police further detained seven activists of the collective. Those detained were released in the evening.

The MCGM had served an eviction and demolition notice to residents of Panchsheel Nagar on 17 October, 2023. However, the residents and a local organization noted that the notice did not have an official seal and signature. Also, it did not mention the CTS location of the area to be demolished. After this, the residents had submitted an application for rehabilitation and threatened to protest against the MCGM. The MCGM had then agreed to identify protected structures before any evictions were conducted.

On February 2, oral announcements were made by BMC officials about the impending demolition. However, on 6 February 2024, the MCGM came to the settlement without any prior notice and carried out the demolitions.

MCGM officials informed the residents that the evictions were conducted for construction of a girls hostel and a park as mentioned in the Development Plan. Residents, however, protested outside the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) office against procedural violation during the eviction drive.

The MCGM did not conduct a survey of all residents or create the Annexure of eligible and ineligible residents. As per the eligibility, the MCGM is bound to rehabilitate people prior to demolishing structures built before 01.01.2011. These complaints were not answered by the officials of MCGM and they continued demolishing houses on the second day as well.

On 8 February, 2024, the residents along with Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti, called for a protest march demanding an immediate halt on evictions and urged the MCGM to follow the due procedures of law. They also demanded restoration of water and electricity connections; making a list of eligible and ineligible slum dwellers based on documents submitted; holding hearings in case of objections; and correct the incorrect data based on which demolitions were done. After the protest, the MCGM halted the demolitions for seven days. However, fearing complete eviction from the land after the end of seven days, residents started a sit in protest at the site demanding MCGM to follow the procedures established to evict and rehabilitate slum dwellers.

A week later, the MCGM officials agreed to grant residents seven days' time to submit their documents, after which they said they will prepare the annexure, and then take action.

The Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti organisation has submitted documents of all residents as per the resettlement deadline of 2011. They also met the area MLA Nawab Malik who assured the rehabilitation of those eligible and confirmed the plan to construct a hostel for working women on the said plot.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

7

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

LCW researcher spoke to people who got detained and those who were lathicharged during the demolition drive.

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971
Section 3(1) [Declaration of an area as a 'slum area' by state government]; Section 3A [Appointment of a slum rehabilitation authority for areas falling under the Act. Such officials to ensure rehabilitation scheme for slums is implemented.] Section 3Z [State government must consider relocation and rehabilitation of occupants falling under this Act before eviction] 
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
Section 33 [Planning authority may prepare comprehensive plans for development of particular areas, including slum areas. Such plans must go through the same procedure of public consultation]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Arrest/detention/imprisonment

Lathicharge/teargas/pellets

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

On 6 February, 2024, when officials of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) arrived in Panchsheel Nagar to evict and demolish slum structures, the residents along with activists of Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti (a people's collective that works on housing and labour rights) physically resisted the demolitions. The police then used minor force and detained seven activists of the collective. They further lathicharged the residents trying to individually resist the eviction from their household. Those detained were released in the evening.

Date of Violation

February 5, 2024

Location of Violation

Panchsheel Nagar, Govandi

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

7

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Protests outside ward office against demolition in Panchsheel Nagar.

Image Credit:  

Chetana Kothari

Image Credit:  

Video

Chetana Kothari

Over 1,000 people were rendered homeless after the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) demolished about 200 structures on 6 and 7 February, 2024, in Panchsheel Nagar slum in Govandi, in Mumbai suburb, without prior notice.

Residents along with activists of Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti resisted the demolitions, which were carried out in haste, barely allowing them to collect their documents and belongings.

Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti members alleged that the police lathicharged the residents trying to individually resist the eviction from their household. The police further detained seven activists of the collective. Those detained were released in the evening.

The MCGM had served an eviction and demolition notice to residents of Panchsheel Nagar on 17 October, 2023. However, the residents and a local organization noted that the notice did not have an official seal and signature. Also, it did not mention the CTS location of the area to be demolished. After this, the residents had submitted an application for rehabilitation and threatened to protest against the MCGM. The MCGM had then agreed to identify protected structures before any evictions were conducted.

On February 2, oral announcements were made by BMC officials about the impending demolition. However, on 6 February 2024, the MCGM came to the settlement without any prior notice and carried out the demolitions.

MCGM officials informed the residents that the evictions were conducted for construction of a girls hostel and a park as mentioned in the Development Plan. Residents, however, protested outside the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) office against procedural violation during the eviction drive.

The MCGM did not conduct a survey of all residents or create the Annexure of eligible and ineligible residents. As per the eligibility, the MCGM is bound to rehabilitate people prior to demolishing structures built before 01.01.2011. These complaints were not answered by the officials of MCGM and they continued demolishing houses on the second day as well.

On 8 February, 2024, the residents along with Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti, called for a protest march demanding an immediate halt on evictions and urged the MCGM to follow the due procedures of law. They also demanded restoration of water and electricity connections; making a list of eligible and ineligible slum dwellers based on documents submitted; holding hearings in case of objections; and correct the incorrect data based on which demolitions were done. After the protest, the MCGM halted the demolitions for seven days. However, fearing complete eviction from the land after the end of seven days, residents started a sit in protest at the site demanding MCGM to follow the procedures established to evict and rehabilitate slum dwellers.

A week later, the MCGM officials agreed to grant residents seven days' time to submit their documents, after which they said they will prepare the annexure, and then take action.

The Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti organisation has submitted documents of all residents as per the resettlement deadline of 2011. They also met the area MLA Nawab Malik who assured the rehabilitation of those eligible and confirmed the plan to construct a hostel for working women on the said plot.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971
Section 3(1) [Declaration of an area as a 'slum area' by state government]; Section 3A [Appointment of a slum rehabilitation authority for areas falling under the Act. Such officials to ensure rehabilitation scheme for slums is implemented.] Section 3Z [State government must consider relocation and rehabilitation of occupants falling under this Act before eviction] 
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
Section 33 [Planning authority may prepare comprehensive plans for development of particular areas, including slum areas. Such plans must go through the same procedure of public consultation]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Arrest/detention/imprisonment

Lathicharge/teargas/pellets

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

On 6 February, 2024, when officials of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) arrived in Panchsheel Nagar to evict and demolish slum structures, the residents along with activists of Jan Haqq Sangarsh Samiti (a people's collective that works on housing and labour rights) physically resisted the demolitions. The police then used minor force and detained seven activists of the collective. They further lathicharged the residents trying to individually resist the eviction from their household. Those detained were released in the evening.

Date of Violation

February 5, 2024

Location of Violation

Panchsheel Nagar, Govandi

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
Protests outside ward office against demolition in Panchsheel Nagar.

Protests outside ward office against demolition in Panchsheel Nagar.

Image Credit:  

Chetana Kothari

Protests outside ward office against demolition in Panchsheel Nagar.

Image Credit:  

Chetana Kothari

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Maharashtra

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now