Hindustan Powerprojects, formerly known as Moser Baer, proposed the 2,520 MW Moser Baer Thermal Power Project in Laharpur Murra, Guwari, Belia, and Jethari villages of Anuppur district, Madhya Pradesh. Around 36% of the population in these villages belongs to the Scheduled Tribes, while nearly 10% of the project area comprises forestland, requiring forest clearance before any diversion.
The project involved the diversion of approximately 37.875 hectares of forestland as part of a larger land acquisition for the plant and associated infrastructure.
According to affected villagers and activists, this diversion was allegedly not disclosed either during the public hearing or in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports prepared for obtaining environmental clearance.
On 4 June 2010, the Chief Conservator of Forests, Bhopal, issued Moser Baer a list of environmental conditions, based on which a provisional agreement permitting the use of 37.875 hectares of forestland was granted. However, according to villagers, the company failed to comply with any of the stipulated conditions. They also alleged that village-level meetings were never organised to discuss compensation and rehabilitation, that land was acquired from them at throwaway prices, and that many affected families did not receive compensation. Those who did were reportedly offered compensation as low as ₹16 per square metre. Concerns over the acquisition process intensified in 2012, when the Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) wrote to then Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, alleging several irregularities.
The letter claimed that mandatory clearances under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the Forest Rights Act, 2006, had not been obtained. It also alleged irregularities in the grant of environmental clearance and non-compliance with the provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA). As deliberations on a new land acquisition law were underway nationally, affected villagers demanded that their land be acquired under what later became the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, which provides stronger safeguards relating to compensation and rehabilitation.
Villagers opposed the project, arguing that Anuppur is a water-scarce region and that a thermal power plant of this scale would adversely affect water availability and local livelihoods. During the protests, villagers alleged that police registered criminal cases against several protesters. During protests in 2012, police opened fire on demonstrators in the project area, killing one person and injuring 27, and registered criminal cases against several villagers.
In 2014, petitioner Bindu Rathore challenged the land acquisition proceedings carried out under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, before the District Court in Anuppur, seeking enhanced compensation. The Reference Court subsequently enhanced the compensation payable to the petitioner. Hindustan Power (formerly Moser Baer) challenged the enhanced compensation before the Madhya Pradesh High Court in First Appeal No. 818 of 2016, where the dispute relating to compensation remains pending.
The thermal power plant was declared commercially operational in 2018. According to the Environmental Impact Assessment report, the project was expected to displace 290 families. However, affected villagers alleged that rehabilitation and resettlement for these families had still not been completed. When Land Conflict Watch spoke to Rajkumar Sinha of the National Alliance of People's Movements on 11 October 2019, he said the movement had weakened because of the government's unwillingness to address the demands of the affected communities.
The project underwent a major ownership change in October 2024, when Adani Power Limited acquired the Anuppur thermal power project company from Hindustan Power/Moser Baer. Despite the change in ownership, long-standing issues relating to land acquisition, compensation, rehabilitation, and compliance with the Forest Rights Act and PESA remained unresolved. In May 2025, villagers again protested after land‑levelling and preparatory work reportedly began for the project’s proposed 800 MW expansion. Farmers attempted to reclaim and cultivate portions of the acquired land, and resistance by local communities temporarily halted some construction activity.
Farmers attempted to reclaim and cultivate portions of the acquired land, and resistance by local communities temporarily halted some construction activity.
On 18 July 2025, Land Conflict Watch spoke to Santosh Agarwal, State President of the Bharatiya Kisan Union, who highlighted that Anuppur is predominantly a Schedule V district with a large Adivasi population. He said, "None of the government's promises related to jobs and rehabilitation have been fulfilled. The villagers continue to live beside the thermal plant on whatever land they have left. The struggle has now become inactive after years of police clampdown and suppression.
On 3 August 2025, media reports documented renewed demands by affected villagers to renegotiate the original land acquisition, citing unfulfilled promises relating to employment and rehabilitation, inadequate compensation, and the alleged illegal acquisition of land.
Shortly thereafter, on 30 August 2025, Adani Power received a Letter of Award from the Government of Madhya Pradesh for establishing an additional 800 MW ultra-supercritical unit at the Anuppur thermal power project. The award indicated that expansion plans were moving forward even as the long-standing grievances of Adivasi and farming communities regarding land acquisition, compensation, rehabilitation, compliance with the Forest Rights Act and PESA, and implementation of earlier promises remained unresolved.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for promised compensation
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Common and Private
Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project underway despite protests
Original Project Deadline
2014
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Yes
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Other natural resource collection/dependence
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
10500
Type of investment:
Revised Investment
Year of Estimation
2025
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Land Acquisition Laws, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Environmental Law, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Non-payment of compensation/promised compensation
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Pending
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
National Green Tribunal, High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Case Number
Appeal No. 18 of 2011, F.A.No.818 of 2016 and 836 of 2016 (connected case)
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Arrest/detention/imprisonment
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
The police fired on protesters; 27 people were seriously injured and one person died. Several protesters were also detained. The police also filed criminal charges against the protesters.
Date of Violation
May 4, 2012
Location of Violation
Jaithari, Anuppur
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Madhya Pradesh Forest Department
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Madhya Pradesh Power Management Company Limited (MPPMCL)
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Hindustan Power Projects Private Limited (HPPPCL), Adani Power Ltd, MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
No
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Gauds, Bhaina, Jaiswal, Ganesh, Munka tribes
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?







