Madhya Pradesh
Sagoria Village
,
Buxwaha
,
Chhatarpur
Published :
Mar 2022
|
Updated :
Diamond Mining Project in MP's Buxwaha Violates Environmental Laws, Threatens Forests, Biodiversity
Reported by
Rishabh Shrivastava
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
8000
People affected
2019
Year started
382
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
8000
People Affected
2019
Year started
382
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Diamond mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Diamond mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

A new diamond mining project in the forests of Buxwaha have come under the radar of activists and environmentalists. The state government, in December 2019, awarded a mining lease for the Bunder Diamond Block to Essel Mining & Industries Limited, an Aditya Birla Group company. The Bunder block is spread over 364 hectares of forest area in Sogoriya village in Buxwaha tehsil. The block is estimated to have 34 million carats of rough diamonds (diamonds occuring naturally inside the earth). The district administration has diverted 382 hectares of forestland for the project. 

Two petitions filed in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) by P.G. Najpande and Ujjwal Sharma claimed that the project will cause deforestation by cutting four lakh trees and will exacerbate the water crisis in the Bundelkhand region. The petition also noted that the government cleared the project in violation of several environmental laws. Accepting the arguments put forward by the petitioner, the NGT bench imposed an interim stay on the project in July 2021. The bench also noted several legal anomalies, including violation of the Forest Conservation Act of 1980, failure to get permission for groundwater extraction, lack of a comprehensive environmental impact assessment and the absence of a working plan for the conservation of wildlife. 

Talking to LCW, Rambabu Tiwari, a local student activist working on water issues in Bundelkhand and part of the Save Buxwaha campaign, said, “The company has succeeded in brainwashing the village people. They are supporting the project because the company has promised them employment, flats, roads and airports at the costs of unsustainable development and indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources like forests and water.” Expressing concern about the fate of forests in Buxwaha, Tiwari added that the campaign was losing momentum as the company was more powerful and had more resources at its disposal. “They have the support of the government, but this project is harmful for the region,” he said.

Save Buxwaha is an online/community mobilisation campaign aimed at spreading awareness about the problem of bauxite mining in the region and garnering support for the cause.

Buxwaha had witnessed similar protests earlier in 2016 when a mining lease was granted to Australian mining giant Rio Tinto. The company made an unexpected exit in 2017, handing over the project to the state. Stiff resistance and environmental concerns are speculated as reasons behind the company’s exit.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2500

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2019

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest department, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

LCW reached out to Krishan Sinha, general manager, Essel Mining & Industries Limited, via phone and email but did not get any response.

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Essel Mining & Industries Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Yes

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

National Alliance of People's Movement, Save Buxwaha Movement

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rishabh Shrivastava

Rishabh is a lawyer and writer working on issues of climate change, public health and social justice. He has more than six years of experience in communications, public engagement, media advocacy and editorial roles. Rishabh has delivered projects with the United Nations Development Programme (India), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research - Indian Institute of Petroleum (GoI), Government of Uttarakhand and Government of Chhattisgarh. Storytelling and content creation are his core interests.

Show more work
Latest updates
Surendranagar
Gujarat

Protests against solar power plant in Dhrangadhra’s Moti Malvan village in Gujarat

Tiruvannamalai
Tamil Nadu

Farmers protest new SIPCOT industrial complex project in Tamil Nadu's Thiruvannamalai

Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh

Farmers demand compensation for land diverted for thermal power plant in Vishakhapatnam

Nainital
Uttarakhand

6 killed in Haldwani amid protest over demolition of mosque and madrasa

Pune
Maharashtra

Pune residents protest felling of trees for transit corridor, fear groundwater contamination

North Delhi
Delhi

DDA razes down encroachments near Azadpur Mandi in Delhi, 250 families rendered homeless

North West Delhi
Delhi

Residents of Delhi's Shakur Basti continue to live in fear of demolition

Jalgaon
Maharashtra

Farmers in Maharashtra's Jalgaon allege 1100 acres fraudulently acquired by solar power companies

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us