Assam
,
Maijan
,
Dibrugarh
Published :
Aug 2026
|
Updated :
Dibrugarh land conflict emerges over eviction, alleged fraudulent transactions and riverbank protection
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
60
Households affected
288
People affected
2026
Year started
0.8
ha.
Land area affected
60
Households affected
288
People Affected
2026
Year started
0.8
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Dibrugarh district administration carried out an eviction drive in the Paltan Bazar area behind the Chief Minister’s Secretariat on 15 June 2026, displacing nearly 60 families from around nine bighas of government land along the Brahmaputra River in the Maijan area.

According to the administration, several occupants had constructed permanent Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) houses and had been illegally residing on the government land for over a decade. The eviction followed a decision by the Dibrugarh Sessions Court, after which notices were served to the occupants. Ahead of the operation, many families were seen removing their belongings before the excavation machinery arrived at the site. A large contingent of police personnel was deployed to maintain law and order.

Several displaced residents alleged that they had unknowingly purchased government land from brokers, paying between Rs 1 lakh and Rs 3 lakh under the belief that the plots were legally available. One affected resident said, “Seven years ago, I paid Rs 1.5 lakh to a broker who assured me the land was legal. Now we have lost both our money and our home.”

Another resident claimed that an organised network of intermediaries had been operating in the area for years, allegedly selling government land to unsuspecting buyers. The residents have urged the authorities to investigate the alleged brokers and take action against those responsible for the fraudulent transactions.

The eviction drive was carried out under tight security with support from the Dibrugarh Police and officials from various government departments. Following the eviction, Samujjwal Borah, Officer of the Dibrugarh East Revenue Circle, said, “We had made adequate security arrangements keeping in mind the scale of the eviction, but the residents cooperated fully with the administration. There was no untoward incident during the entire operation.”

Authorities stated the drive was necessary to reclaim public property and prevent further encroachment along the ecologically sensitive Brahmaputra riverbank. According to the administration, the reclaimed land will now be brought under government control to prevent any future illegal occupation. “What began as a small settlement gradually grew into a full-fledged colony over the past decade. The encroachment had reached a point where it posed serious concerns for the riverbank ecosystem and future flood management. Strict measures will be enforced to ensure no fresh encroachment occurs,” an official said.

Authorities added that the larger objective of the eviction is to protect riverbank areas from unauthorised occupation while preserving them for flood management and environmental conservation.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for action against the brokers/third party dealers

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Dwelling/habitation use

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Dibrugarh East Revenue Circle; District & Sessions Judge Court, Dibrugarh; Dibrugarh District Administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us