Maharashtra
Bhaliwadi (2.29 ha), Ambot (1.34 ha), Potal (6.87), Pali (48.14 ha), Saidongar (11.79 ha) and Dhak (73.55 ha)
,
Dhak
,
Raigadh
Published :
Jul 2026
|
Updated :
Water, forests, and energy: Local resistance to the Torrent Power's pumped storage hydro project in Karjat, Maharashtra
Reported by
Shubham Kothari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2025
Year started
377
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2025
Year started
377
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Karjat are feeling the intense pressure of the push of Maharashtra government to transform the largely tribal and forested region into a region of water and electricity generation hub. The Maharashtra government has announced multiple large scale projects like the Poshir and Shillar dam and the Torrent Power's pumped storage hydro power plant projects in the environmentally sensitive zone of Karjat.

The residents of Dhak, Potal, and Pali villages and tribals near the Saidongar have started mobilising against the proposed Torrent Power's plant. The 3,000 MW hydro power plant proposed in Saidongar is a major pumped-storage hydropower project planned by Torrent Power Ltd. The project, covering a total of 370 hectares (233 ha of forest area and 144 ha of non-forested area), will comprise of two reservoirs. The upper reservoir will be constructed on the hilltop with maximum dam height of 27 m to create the desired storage capacity while the lower reservoir will have maximum height of 59 m and shall be constructed across River Pej.

The total cost of the project is Rs 13,505 crore, which includes the cost of of procurement of private land based on the market rate. Private land is required to be acquired from the following villages: Bhaliwadi (2.29 ha), Ambot (1.34 ha), Potal (6.87), Pali (48.14 ha), Saidongar (11.79 ha) and Dhak (73.55 ha)

According to the draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) report, no Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) Plan is required as the proposed PSP project is less than 1000 ha. As per the Government of Maharashtra's Gazette notification (Maharashtra Gazette notification No. LQN. 12/2013/C.R. 190/A-2 dated 27th August 2014), the provisions of Rehabilitation and Resettlement under RFCTLARR 2013 will apply only in case of private company purchases land through private negotiations to an extent equivalent or more than 1,000 ha.

In 2023, Torrent Power Limited had signed an agreement with the government of Maharashtra for three pumped storage hydro projects of 5,700 megawatt (MW) capacity. With an investment of Rs 27,000 crore, the company is working on three projects at – Karjat (3,000 MW) in Raigarh district; Maval (1,200 MW) and Junnar (1,500 MW) in Pune districts.

Locals say that at least a few lakh trees will be cut down for the project. They fear that if the forest shrinks, wildlife will migrate and enter human settlements and damage their farms and houses. Demanding the government to cancel the project, the farmers also question if the project will benefit locals as water generated by the project is expected to be supplied to other cities.

Residents of Dhak and Potal villages demanded the government to cancel the pumped-storage hydro power plant project by Torrent Power citing adverse impacts of felling of trees on a large scale on their livelihood and natural resources. Residents, led by Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) party, protested in front of Karjat Tehsildar office in April 2026 and submitted representations of their opposition to various government departments.

Despite protests from residents the project has received environmental and pollution board clearances. The residents have vowed to intensify there protests against this environmentally destructive project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Dwelling/habitation use, Non-agri rural enterprise, Other natural resource collection/dependence, Water bodies, Grazing, Ecosystem/Environmental Services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

13505.15

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2025

Page Number In Investment Document:

16

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Torrent PSH 3 Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shubham Kothari

Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Dwelling/habitation use, Non-agri rural enterprise, Other natural resource collection/dependence, Water bodies, Grazing, Ecosystem/Environmental Services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us