Haryana
Nearby villages of Ankhir, Mewla Maharajpur, and Lakkarpur Khori
,
Anangpur
,
Faridabad
Published :
Mar 2019
|
Updated :
Punjab Land Preservation Act enforcement, village settlements, and displacement concerns: The Anangpur conflict in Faridabad
Reported by
Damandeep Singh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
5938
Households affected
People affected
2025
Year started
76.08
ha.
Land area affected
5938
Households affected
People Affected
2025
Year started
76.08
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Anangpur village in Haryana’s Faridabad are protesting a demolition drive by the state’s Forest Department that threatens the removal of their shops and houses. The drive by the district administration is in compliance with a 2022 Supreme Court ruling, which directed that all unauthorised structures built on forest land protected under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA) should be removed.

The SC directive stated that the first phase of the demolition drive should start with identifying and removing unauthorised structures in the villages of Ankhir, Mewla Mahrajpur, Anangpur, and Lakarpur in the district of Faridabad. Following the SC order, approximately 5,938 houses and small shops spread across 188 acres of land in these villages have been identified, according to an Action Taken Report (ATR) filed by the state government. 

The SC in July 2022 had ruled that “all the concerned authorities shall take action to remove the remaining illegal structures standing on land covered by the special orders and used for non-forest activities… without prior approval of the Central Government.” The court further said, “At the first stage, the unauthorised structures in villages Ankhir, Mewla Mahrajpur, Anangpur and Lakarpur in the district Faridabad, required to be removed from forest areas, need to be identified. Therefore, there is a need to establish the procedure for the identification of unauthorised structures in forest land.”

However, since 2022, not much action was taken by the state government on the ground. But in December 2024, a ground-truthing exercise by the state government identified 6,793 unauthorised structures built across 786.26 acres of land in the four villages. There were 5,948 illegal structures in Anangpur village alone, while 339 such structures were found in Ankhir, 313 in Lakkarpur. Most of the land area in these villages is occupied by commercial structures. Following this exercise in April 2025, the SC increased the timeline to comply with its July 2022 order till 31 July 2025. 

Following the SC order, the Haryana government started the demolition process. In the first phase of the demolition drive, 241 structures spread over an area of about 261 acres in the four villages have already been demolished as of July 1. Initially, only commercial structures, including farmhouses, banquet halls, and marriage gardens, have been demolished to clear a larger land area under the PLPA, the government said in an action taken report (ATR). The report also stated that there is resentment among the residents of the villages against the demolition drive that also targets their houses and small shops. 

In an incident on July 2, the residents of Anangpur village allegedly pelted stones at the government officials during a demolition drive in Anangpur, the Times of India reported. In response, the police arrested three people, who were allegedly responsible for inciting the group of residents and attacking government officials.

"As officials carried out the demolition, a mob began pelting stones at the demolition team and other staff members, causing injuries and disrupting government work. Several official vehicles were also damaged during the attack," a police officer told Times of India. A case was registered at Surajkund police station under sections 121 (1) (voluntarily causing hurt), 132 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 190 (unlawful assembly), 191(2) (rioting), 221 (obstructing public servant in discharge of duty), 222 (3a) public servant when bound by law to assist) and 324 (4) (mischief).

On 14 July, the village residents also organised the “Anangpur Mahapanchayat,” where huge crowds from several villages gathered to protest against the forest department’s drive to “destroy centuries-old settlements and villages.”

The village residents also filed a petition dated 17 July 2025, mentioning that as per the order of the SC, 5700 houses of village residents across have been identified. “The ownership of this land vests with local villagers as per revenue records… the said villagers cannot be located to some other place as the land in question constitutes the sole holding of these villagers and they do not own or possess any alternative residential land either in Faridabad District or adjoining,” the petition said. The villagers, through the petition, also “requested to consider the peculiar facts of village Anangpur….and either regularising the said area or to keep out the said area out of the purview of PLPA.”

Earlier in 2019, the Supreme Court stayed the amendments to the 119-year-old Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), admonishing the Haryana government for passing the amendment bill in "sheer contempt of court". The apex court termed the government's move a "misadventure" and accused it of destroying forests. Environmentalists hailed the court's order while property owners and real estate developers objected to the verdict.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

To stop the demolition drive of households and small shops under the Punjab Land Preservation (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2019

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

3

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't Know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Dwelling/habitation use

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

₹

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Haryana Government Haryana Forest Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

N/A

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

3

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't Know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Damandeep Singh

Damandeep is a research scholar in the Department of Political Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, and Assistant Professor (Political Science) in Trai Shatabdi Guru Gobind Singh Khalsa College, Amritsar. He is interested in understanding the politics of heritage and its impact on contemporary cityscapes. He has completed his Master’s in Political Science from Panjab University.

‍

Show more work
JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us