Residents of Anangpur village in Haryana’s Faridabad are protesting a demolition drive by the state’s Forest Department that threatens the removal of their shops and houses. The drive by the district administration is in compliance with a 2022 Supreme Court ruling, which directed that all unauthorised structures built on forest land protected under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA) should be removed.
The SC directive stated that the first phase of the demolition drive should start with identifying and removing unauthorised structures in the villages of Ankhir, Mewla Mahrajpur, Anangpur, and Lakarpur in the district of Faridabad. Following the SC order, approximately 5,938 houses and small shops spread across 188 acres of land in these villages have been identified, according to an Action Taken Report (ATR) filed by the state government.
The SC in July 2022 had ruled that “all the concerned authorities shall take action to remove the remaining illegal structures standing on land covered by the special orders and used for non-forest activities… without prior approval of the Central Government.” The court further said, “At the first stage, the unauthorised structures in villages Ankhir, Mewla Mahrajpur, Anangpur and Lakarpur in the district Faridabad, required to be removed from forest areas, need to be identified. Therefore, there is a need to establish the procedure for the identification of unauthorised structures in forest land.”
However, since 2022, not much action was taken by the state government on the ground. But in December 2024, a ground-truthing exercise by the state government identified 6,793 unauthorised structures built across 786.26 acres of land in the four villages. There were 5,948 illegal structures in Anangpur village alone, while 339 such structures were found in Ankhir, 313 in Lakkarpur. Most of the land area in these villages is occupied by commercial structures. Following this exercise in April 2025, the SC increased the timeline to comply with its July 2022 order till 31 July 2025.
Following the SC order, the Haryana government started the demolition process. In the first phase of the demolition drive, 241 structures spread over an area of about 261 acres in the four villages have already been demolished as of July 1. Initially, only commercial structures, including farmhouses, banquet halls, and marriage gardens, have been demolished to clear a larger land area under the PLPA, the government said in an action taken report (ATR). The report also stated that there is resentment among the residents of the villages against the demolition drive that also targets their houses and small shops.
In an incident on July 2, the residents of Anangpur village allegedly pelted stones at the government officials during a demolition drive in Anangpur, the Times of India reported. In response, the police arrested three people, who were allegedly responsible for inciting the group of residents and attacking government officials.
"As officials carried out the demolition, a mob began pelting stones at the demolition team and other staff members, causing injuries and disrupting government work. Several official vehicles were also damaged during the attack," a police officer told Times of India. A case was registered at Surajkund police station under sections 121 (1) (voluntarily causing hurt), 132 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 190 (unlawful assembly), 191(2) (rioting), 221 (obstructing public servant in discharge of duty), 222 (3a) public servant when bound by law to assist) and 324 (4) (mischief).
On 14 July, the village residents also organised the “Anangpur Mahapanchayat,” where huge crowds from several villages gathered to protest against the forest department’s drive to “destroy centuries-old settlements and villages.”
The village residents also filed a petition dated 17 July 2025, mentioning that as per the order of the SC, 5700 houses of village residents across have been identified. “The ownership of this land vests with local villagers as per revenue records… the said villagers cannot be located to some other place as the land in question constitutes the sole holding of these villagers and they do not own or possess any alternative residential land either in Faridabad District or adjoining,” the petition said. The villagers, through the petition, also “requested to consider the peculiar facts of village Anangpur….and either regularising the said area or to keep out the said area out of the purview of PLPA.”
Earlier in 2019, the Supreme Court stayed the amendments to the 119-year-old Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), admonishing the Haryana government for passing the amendment bill in "sheer contempt of court". The apex court termed the government's move a "misadventure" and accused it of destroying forests. Environmentalists hailed the court's order while property owners and real estate developers objected to the verdict.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for legal recognition of land rights
Demand to cancel the project
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
To stop the demolition drive of households and small shops under the Punjab Land Preservation (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2019
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Private
Forest
What was the action taken by the police?
Arrest
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
3
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
Don't Know
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Dwelling/habitation use
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Constitutional Law, Other
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Violation of environmental laws
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Pending
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Supreme Court
Case Number
CİVIL APPEAL NO. 10294 OF 2013
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Yes
Reported Details of the Violation:
According to the Times of India, during a demolition drive in Anangpur village on July 2, 2025, residents started pelting stones at the government officials carrying out the demolition. In response, the police arrested three people, who were allegedly responsible for inciting the group of residents and attacking government officials. "As officials carried out the demolition, a mob began pelting stones at the demolition team and other staff members, causing injuries and disrupting government work. Several official vehicles were also damaged during the attack," a police officer told Times of India A case was registered at Surajkund police station under sections 121 (1) (voluntarily causing hurt), 132 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 190 (unlawful assembly), 191(2) (rioting), 221 (obstructing public servant in discharge of duty), 222 (3a) public servant when bound by law to give assistance) and 324 (4) (mischief).
Date of Violation
July 1, 2025
Location of Violation
Anangpur
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Haryana Government Haryana Forest Department
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
N/A
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
What was the action taken by the police?
Arrest
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
3
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
Don't Know
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?







