Assam
,
Guwahati
,
Kamrup
Published :
Jun 2024
|
Updated :
Locals raise concerns over potential impact of Kamakhya Corridor project on heritage and water sources
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2024
Year started
1
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
1
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

On 3 April 2024, the Gauhati High Court ordered the Assam government to reply to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the construction of the Maa Kamakhya Temple Access Corridor.

In February 2024, the Prime Minister launched the ambitious Rs 498 crore Kamakhya corridor project. Under the project, the cumulative open space around the temple will increase from 3000 sq ft at present to approximately 100,000 sq ft, spread over three levels. The average width of the access corridor would increase from its current width of 8-10 feet to approximately 27-30 feet, an official told the Hindustan Times. Concurrently, the access corridor will be widened from its current 8-10 feet width to 27-30 feet.

The petitioners appealed to the court to stop the construction of the 'Maa Kamakhya Temple Access Corridor' in Nilachal Hill until necessary approvals and clearances are acquired from the Department of Archaeology under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (as amended in 2010) to safeguard and preserve historically significant monuments, which are more than 2,000 years old.

The Gauhati High Court issued notices to the central and state governments, as well as other involved parties, including the construction company L&T, asking them to respond to the petition.

The petitioners also sought details on a white paper outlining the plans to preserve the monuments of the temple, such as the natural cave, regarded as the cosmic womb and Dasa Mahavidyas, symbolised by natural water springs. They also raised concerns that this could directly impact the sacred water stream in the Kamakhya temple's sanctuary.

Petitioner Navajyoti Sarma informed the court that the project is a five-phase project which involves significant demolition, excavation, and reconstruction within the temple grounds. He also highlighted that no geological or irrigation surveys were conducted before the project's commencement to assess potential impacts on water sources.

On 22 April 2024, advocate D Nath and advocate general Devajit Lon Saikia on behalf of the state government submitted a report confirming that the development of the corridor “will not compromise the integrity of the revered temple structures or the Nilachal hills”. Saikia dubbed all opposing claims “unfounded and driven by commercial motives”.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

498

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2024

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Assam government

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Construction Company: L&T

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
Surendranagar
Gujarat

Protests against solar power plant in Dhrangadhra’s Moti Malvan village in Gujarat

Tiruvannamalai
Tamil Nadu

Farmers protest new SIPCOT industrial complex project in Tamil Nadu's Thiruvannamalai

Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh

Farmers demand compensation for land diverted for thermal power plant in Vishakhapatnam

Nainital
Uttarakhand

6 killed in Haldwani amid protest over demolition of mosque and madrasa

Pune
Maharashtra

Pune residents protest felling of trees for transit corridor, fear groundwater contamination

North Delhi
Delhi

DDA razes down encroachments near Azadpur Mandi in Delhi, 250 families rendered homeless

North West Delhi
Delhi

Residents of Delhi's Shakur Basti continue to live in fear of demolition

Jalgaon
Maharashtra

Farmers in Maharashtra's Jalgaon allege 1100 acres fraudulently acquired by solar power companies

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us