Environmentalists and farmers have raised concerns over the Assam government’s plans to facilitate luxury hotel development near Kaziranga National Park, involving the Tata Group and the Hyatt Hotels Corporation. On 3 August 2024, the Assam government signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Tata Group’s Indian Hotels Company Limited (IHCL) to build a Taj Resort and Spa in Kaziranga at an estimated investment of Rs 120 crore. Earlier in 2023, the state government had announced plans for a proposed Hyatt hotel in the area, with an investment of Rs 100 crore. However, a Hyatt Hotels spokesperson later told Mongabay-India that the company does not have any project in Kaziranga. The proposed hotel developments have drawn opposition from environmentalists and farmers, who have raised concerns over their potential impacts on local communities, agricultural land and the protected ecosystem surrounding Kaziranga National Park.
Locals contend that these hotels in a UNESCO World Heritage Site could have a “catastrophic” impact on Kaziranga’s fragile ecosystem, teeming with its world-famous elephants, and also displace people who depend on the land for their livelihood. On the other hand, Hyatt has chosen Hathikuli Inglay Pothar as the location for its hotel. However, this area is a traditional habitat for elephants, and locals consider the area a "playground for elephants".
Soneswar Narah, a member of Jeepal Krishak Samiti, said, “These areas provide temporary refuge on higher ground during the floods, but with their construction, the animals will have nowhere to go”. He emphasised the local community's hardships, citing the demolition of Lokhu Gowala’s house on 7 June 2024 by authorities, seen as the initial move to make way for hotel construction.
Mubina Akhtar, a journalist and conservationist, said that the government has allegedly started labelling the people residing on the designated hotel site as “encroachers.” She pointed out that these tribal communities have lived and farmed the land for generations, having been displaced from their original homes by river erosion. She further asked, “How can the forest department authorise a five-star hotel construction in the same area where they won’t even permit digging a well, citing environmental concerns?” Mohan Malakar, a retired PCCF of Assam, stated, “If there’s an elephant corridor and if it serves as a refuge and migratory path for these elephants, such construction shouldn’t be permitted. The movement of elephants must not be impeded. A thorough cost-benefit analysis should be conducted before proceeding with this project.”
Meanwhile, Dr. Sanjib Kumar Borkakoti, an expert member of ICOMOS and various cultural heritage committees, wrote to the Assam Director of Tourism expressing worry about proposed hotel developments in Kaziranga National Park. He stated that building hotels, including a Hyatt property in an elephant habitat, could harm the park's ecology by disrupting important elephant migration routes. The letter emphasises the need to combine environmental conservation with development while acknowledging the former's importance.
In 2024, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) took suo motu cognisance, issuing notices over threats to wildlife and lack of clearances under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. However, in July 2025, the NGT’s Eastern Bench dismissed the petition concerning the construction of two five-star hotels near Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve (KNPTR) on 21 February 2025.
The NGT’s Principal Bench had taken suo motu cognisance of a news report highlighting the potential impacts of the proposed hotels on local communities and wildlife and initiated proceedings against the Assam government. Legal experts and local activists have since questioned the verdict, arguing that the NGT’s judicial intervention in the matter was misplaced.
In June 2026, the Gauhati High Court heard a petition by 20 Adivasi families challenging the land allocation and evictions, issuing notices to the Assam Tourism Development Corporation (ATDC). On 12 July, 2026, dozens of police officers in India arrested the prominent Indigenous rights activist Pranab Doley and two other men who were protesting against the project.
Two others surrendered to the court after local cops came looking for them. Police surrounded the house where Mr Doley was staying on Sunday, and took him into custody without an arrest warrant. In which, he was granted bail by the local court on 29 July; however, the government has invoked NSA to detain the environmental activist. The court in its proceedings observed, “In matters where ecological preservation intersects with indigenous survival, the standard apparatus of criminal law cannot be used to suppress local anxieties.”
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand to cancel the project
Opposition against environmental degradation
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Full recognition of land rights for evicted tea-tenancy families and not just monetary compensation
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Type of Land
Common and Private
Forest and Non-Forest
What was the action taken by the police?
Arrest
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
5
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Currently under arrest
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
Don't Know
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Sections 61(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
329(3), 324(2), 221, 132, 121, 121(1), 121(2), 351(3), 74, 326(g), and 62
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
Yes they were informed, Yes they had access
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
No
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project underway despite protests
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
No
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Agricultural land
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
No
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
220
Type of investment:
Investment Expected
Year of Estimation
2024
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
2024
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Environmental Law, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Other, Environmental Law
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
No
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Violation of environmental laws
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Pending
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Yes
Name of the adjudicatory body
National Green Tribunal
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Gauhati High Court
Case Number
NGT OA 1049/2024/PB (renumbered OA 175/2024/EZ)
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Arrest/detention/imprisonment
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Yes
Reported Details of the Violation:
On 7 and 8 August 2024 in Rongajan village, a mob of over 100 people surrounded Manohar Pegu from National Alliance of People's Movement and Ritupan Pegu from the Greater Kaziranga Land and Human Rights Committee and damaged their vehicle while interviewing and documenting the impact of the project on people. In another instance, farmer Minali Gowala and her daughter were assaulted in their home. Fellow activists Minali Gowala, Saurav Patgiri and Shubham were later detained by Bokakhat police. On 13 July, 2026, Pranab Doley, an indigenous rights activist, was arrested from the house he was staying in along with 2 others, allegedly without any arrest warrant.
Date of Violation
July 11, 2026
Location of Violation
Rongajan village, Bokakhat revenue circle, Golaghat district
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Assam Tourism Department, Assam Forest Department, Assam Tourism Development Corporation (ATDC)
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Taj Group, Juniper Hotels, co-owned by Saraf Hotels and Two Seas Holdings, a Hyatt-branding affiliate
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
No
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Jeepal Krishak Samiti; Greater Kaziranga Land and Human Rights Protection Committee (GKLHRPC), National Alliance of People’s Movements (Assam chapter)
What was the action taken by the police?
Arrest
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
5
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Currently under arrest
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
Don't Know
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Sections 61(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
329(3), 324(2), 221, 132, 121, 121(1), 121(2), 351(3), 74, 326(g), and 62
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
Yes they were informed, Yes they had access
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
No
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?








