Uttarakhand
Semalchaud, Pattapani
,
Bail Padao
,
Nainital
Published :
Jan 2024
|
Updated :
January 18, 2024
Illegal sand mining in Nainital's Bail Padao raises environmental concerns
Reported by
Chicu Lokgariwar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
4
Households affected
6
People affected
2022
Year started
9
Land area affected
4
Households affected
6
People Affected
2022
Year started
9
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Sand Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Sand Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The floodplains of the Dabka river adjoining the Corbett Tiger Reserve are rich in biodiversity and form an important corridor for grazing and water catchment areas for elephants, large and small wild cats, several canids, and ungulates. However, this is rapidly changing with the increase in sand mining in the area.

With its network of rivers with deep sandy beds, Uttarakhand emerged as one of the major centres for legal and illegal river bed mining for sand. Since 2015, various agencies including the Uttarakhand Irrigation Department and the Forest Development Corporation as well as civil society organisations and local communities have pointed out the extent of river bed mining and its deleterious effects. 

Independent media sources such as the Third Pole and SANDRP have documented the extent to which the State Government has ignored court orders and environmental laws as well as the recommendations of its own departments to permit river bed mining, turning a blind eye to illegal mining.  

Illegal mining has frequently led to clashes between the sand mafia and forest officials with at least one forest official being killed in the line of duty. Due to these factors, there is no comprehensive assessment of the quantum of illegal river bed mining in the state, despite eyewitnesses confirming illegal mining in nearly every river.

In 2022, two individuals, Swarn Singh and Mamta Chourasia, separately filed PILs pointing out illegal sand mining in the villages of Bail Padav, and Semalchoud and Pattapani, respectively. In Pattapani and Durgapalpur, the village temple and school are located at some distance from the excavation site.

A joint inspection committee found that there was illegal mining to a depth and extent in excess of the permitted limits in four of the six cases inspected.

The Pollution Control Board and district magistrate’s office then calculated the fine to be levied. This was later challenged in court by the respondents alleging that the swell factor levied upon the volume of sand was inadmissible. The respondents attested that swell factor determination notification had only come into effect from January 3, 2023, and could not be applied retrospectively. Other respondents also pointed out discrepancies in several inspection reports as well as the absence of the defendants during some of these inspection visits.

At present, this matter is still being contested in court between the defendants and various government departments including the Department of Mines and Geology, the State Pollution Control Board, and the district magistrate’s office. At stake is not only the biodiversity of the Dabka river but also the safety of the farmlands and infrastructure in the surrounding area.

A report by the Wildlife Institute of India on the impacts on sand mining from rivers in Uttarakhand recommended that permission to mine should be reviewed every three years by an appropriate committee so as to monitor if there is any adverse impact on the environment. It also said that mining should not be allowed in the river stretch north of the Kosi Barrage as this area is a functional corridor for both tiger and elephant beyond the Sundarkhal settlement till Kumeria, as kills and crop raids have been reported from the villages around the Kosi River.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

53

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

43

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board, District Magistrate, Geology and Mining Unit (Uttarakhand)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Chicu Lokgariwar

Chicu is an independent consultant working on water conflicts with a focus on stakeholder negotiations.  Since 2008, she has worked on the assessment of environmental flows for several major rivers and studied natural resource-related negotiations conflicts in the Gangetic basin and North-Eastern India. She lives and works in the Uttarakhand Himalaya.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us