Gujarat
,
Pirana
,
Ahmedabad
Published :
Dec 2016
|
Updated :
Gujarat Government Fails to Close Down Pirana Landfill, 3 Lakh People at Health Risk
Reported by
Aditi Patil
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
300000
People affected
1980
Year started
34
Land area affected
Households affected
300000
People Affected
1980
Year started
34
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Waste Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Waste Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Burning garbage at Pirana landfill is reportedly affecting the health of around three lakh people who live in its vicinity. As per the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, garbage dumps and residential areas must be at least 500 metres apart, but the Pirana landfill violates this rule.
The residents filed a public interest litigation in the Gujarat high court demanding immediate closure of the landfill site and shifting its location. In response, the court issued notices to the state government, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) and Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB).
Flammable chemicals at the dump, aided by methane emanating from the rotting garbage, often result in fires engulfing an entire three-kilometre area in thick smoke. A local non-profit had collected medical records of people living at Shahwadi, Piplaj and Ektanagar areas. The records show them suffering from asthama, cancer and heart and kidney-related disease.
According to D.J. Mohan from the Environmental Bureau of Investigation, "The enormous dumping of solid waste has led to an increase in the number of flies and plague-causing rodents. These flies, which carry pathogenic organisms, cause diseases such as dysentery and diarrhoea. It is estimated that about 70,000 flies can live in one cubic foot of garbage. Just imagine the potential of Gyaspur-Pirana."
Moreover, the seepage of toxic materials in the neighbouring areas has led to groundwater pollution. The AMC has never carried out a health survey in the area. However, a 2015 survey conducted by the Insaf Foundation found that 19 people in 40 families had died due to kidney disorders and respiratory issues and two had died of cancer in recent years.
Interestingly, the area largely consists of Dalits, Muslims, Bangladeshi migrants and those displaced by the 2002 riots. Non-profits argue that this has played a significant role in the issue being ignored. The AMC director, on the other hand, has argued that the AMC owes nothing to these people since they are encroachers. On that account, it has refused to provide relief if they are relocated elsewhere.
So far, there have been no attempts to reconstruct the site scientifically. The AMC states that it is not possible since the current garbage load is too much to remove and even temporary closure of the landfill is not an option since the city has no other landfill to accommodate such an amount of garbage.
In June 2017, Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani made an ambitious statement, declaring that the Pirana problem will be solved even if it cost INR 500 crore. The AMC, however, has only discontinued collection of unsegregated waste from households, hoping that this will have an effect on the amount of garbage generated throughout the city.
In February 2019, the Gujarat Urban Development Mission shortlisted Tata Consultancy for the scientific closure of the site. The detailed project report was completed by IL&FS in 2016 and was approved by the Union government.
In March 2019, the Gujarat high court lambasted the AMC for its lackadaisical approach in dealing with the closure of the Pirana landfill and coming up with an alternate site. In July that year, the National Green Tribunal directed the state government to deposit INR 75 crore in an escrow account to clear the site. The AMC is yet to take concrete steps in the direction.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for closure of the garbage mound

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Aditi Patil

Aditi is a freelance development researcher. She has a Master’s in Development Studies from the Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India. She has previously worked with WWF India on forest-based livelihoods and international wildlife trade. She has also worked on the Forest Rights Act in Dangs district in Gujarat. Her paper, “Forest-based livelihoods, Malki practice and Forest Rights Act in Gujarat: The case of Adivasis in the Dangs,” has been published in the book, Adivasis in India: Livelihoods, Resources and Institutions, by Bloomsbury India.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us