Karnataka
Kogilu layout
,
Yelahanka
,
Bengaluru Urban
Published :
Feb 2026
|
Updated :
Evictions for urban waste infrastructure in Bengaluru's Kogilu Layout expose procedural lapses and rehabilitation delays
Reported by
Anisha Reddy
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
300
Households affected
3000
People affected
2025
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
300
Households affected
3000
People Affected
2025
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 20 December, the Bengaluru Solid Waste Management Limited (BSWML) under the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) demolished over 300 alleged illegal homes largely belonging to the Muslim community, in a bid to set up a proposed solid waste processing unit.

While government officials have maintained that the land was allotted to the authority several years ago, residents said they have been living in the area of decades. Many alleged that government officials would come to their area to seek votes ahead of elections. Additionally, they also alleged that they did not receive any written notice prior to the eviction.

Over the last few months, displaced families have been living in makeshift tents in the area, with limited access to essential resources including washroom, shelter and consistent supply of food and water.

Amid criticism, on 29 December 2025, the Karnataka government promised rehabilitation of displaced families on humanitarian grounds under the housing scheme of Rajiv Gandhi Housing Corporation Limited. However, despite public promises, as of February 2026, the displaced residents continue to await rehabilitation.

The case had also reached Karnataka High Court, with petitioners alleging that government officials razed their houses in defiance of a Supreme Court order that mandates show-cause notices and at least 15 days’ time to vacate houses before any eviction on grounds of encroachment. The case is still being discussed in the High Court. On 5 February, the court said that it prima facie accepts that in-situ rehabilitation of evicted families may not be feasible, considering the submission by the state government that inhabiting a solid waste management site is highly injurious and fatal to the health of the persons on the site.

During the hearing, the counsel for the petitioners claimed that the four temporary rehabilitation centres provided by the state government were found to be locked when the displaced residents had visited them. Responding, the court directed the State Legal Services Authority (KSLSA) to submit a report on the temporary rehabilitation measures provided by the state government.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised rehabilitation and compensation.

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Greater Bengaluru Authority; Bengaluru Solid Waste Management Limited

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Dudiyuva Janara Vedike (DJV)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Anisha Reddy
Anisha is a journalist based in Bengaluru, Karnataka. She has reported on stories coming out of South India for the past three years.
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us