Tamil Nadu
Mudukulathur, Thiruvadanai, Paramakudi, Keezhakarai, Kadaladi, and Ramanathapuram taluk; Devakottai taluk in Sivasagar disctrict; Ramnad Offshore Block, Cauvery Basin
,
Keezhakara
,
Ramanathapuram
Published :
Aug 2026
|
Updated :
Energy exploration, coastal livelihoods, and environmental risk: The ONGC Hydrocarbon project in Ramanathapuram
Reported by
Samrita Shankar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Rakshit Dhingra, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
150000
People affected
2023
Year started
140341
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
150000
People Affected
2023
Year started
140341
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In August 2025, political parties, environmental groups, and coastal communities in Tamil Nadu protested against a proposal by the state-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) to execute onshore and offshore exploratory hydrocarbon drilling along the Ramanathapuram coast.

The proposed project entails the drilling of 20 exploratory hydrocarbon wells across the coastal and offshore regions of Ramanathapuram district and parts of neighbouring Sivaganga. At an estimated cost of ₹675 crore, each exploratory well involves deep subterranean drilling - reaching depths of 2,000 to 3,000 meters into the earth and seabed - to test for commercial reserves of crude oil and natural gas. The project was envisioned under the Central Government’s Open Acreage Licensing Policy (OALP), aimed at boosting domestic energy production, reducing India’s dependence on crude oil imports, and evaluating the commercial viability of hydrocarbon reserves along the Cauvery basin and eastern continental shelf.

The ONGC submitted its application to the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority for exploration clearance in October 2023. Following changes in the 2020 Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification - which shifted Category B2 oil and gas exploration projects to state jurisdiction without mandatory public hearings - the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) granted environmental clearance for the 20 exploratory wells on 11 March 2025. ONGC also simultaneously sought exemptions from mandatory public consultation processes under the Environment Protect Act and Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for drilling new exploratory wells.

Moreover, State Coastal Zone Management Plans (SCZMPs) are required to contain fishing zones and fish breeding areas according to the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011. However, the Tamil Nadu SCZMP was approved without including such zones in the SCZMP map, which means there is a lack of legal protection to for community's to stake a claim over their fishing zones.

The project faced resistance from an alliance of traditional fisherfolk, farmers, and environmental groups. Environmental activists and fisherfolk argued that the proposed offshore drilling zone sits dangerously close to the ecologically sensitive Gulf of Mannar Biosphere Reserve, home to protected coral reefs, seagrass beds, and diverse marine life. They argued that seismic testing and toxic chemical discharge from drilling would destroy marine habitats and drive away fish stocks, thus impacting the daily catch and livelihoods of local fishing communities. Farmers expressed concerns over subterranean drilling contaminating freshwater aquifers with heavy metals and chemicals and causing soil salinisation. They also also contented that the project leveraged a gap within the Protected Agricultural Zone Act 2020 in Tamil Nadu, which prohibits hydrocarbon drilling in the Cauvery delta of Thanjavur, Tiruvarur, Nagapattinam, Cuddalore and Pudukottai districts that support most of the agricultural activities in the state, but leaves out Ramanathapuram and Sivagangai though these regions also support such agricultural activities.

In response to the mounting public outcry, the Tamil Nadu State Government stepped in to halt the project. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change instructed the SEIAA to immediately revoke the environmental clearance granted to ONGC, reiterating the state’s executive policy against allowing new hydrocarbon extraction or exploration initiatives. Following government directives, the regulatory authority issued a show-cause notice to ONGC regarding the revocation of the environmental clearance.

An ONGC spokesperson of the corporation told ThePrint that it was monitoring the developments and that they are yet to decide on the next course of action in this regard.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Coastal

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Fishing, Conservation / protection of ecosystems and species, Agricultural land, "Access and mobility to land, water and natural resources"

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/nod-for-ongcs-oil-exploration-in-ramnad-sparks-fire-tn-govt-steps-in-to-douse-it-844411#:~:text=CHENNAI%3A%20Putting%20the%20State%20government%20in%20a,in%20the%20Cauvery%20basin%20in%20Ramanathapuram%20district.

Total investment involved (in Crores):

₹

675

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2025

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc; Invenire Petrodyne Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Samrita Shankar
Samrita is an interdisciplinary researcher with an academic background in law and international development. She has previously worked at the science-policy-practice interface on wildlife conservation issues at both the national and international levels. She is particularly interested in themes at the intersection of law/policy, development and resource governance. At Land Conflict Watch, she will contribute to growing body of research, and field-based analysis on coastal resources, commons and livelihoods – with a focus on their intersection with Blue Economy activities.
Show more work
JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us