Assam
Gharmura Reserved Forest
,
Damcherra
,
Hailakandi
Published :
Feb 2026
|
Updated :
Encroachment, evidence, and enforcement: Inside the eviction drive in Gharmura Reserved Forest in Assam’s Hailakandi
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Amrita Chekkutty, Rakshit Dhingra
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
516
Households affected
2476
People affected
2026
Year started
374.59
ha.
Land area affected
516
Households affected
2476
People Affected
2026
Year started
374.59
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 2 February 2026, the Hailakandi district administration and Forest Department launched a large-scale eviction drive to clear encroachments from the Gharmura Inner Line Reserved Forest. The operation, which began in the Damcherra area under the Gharmura forest range, aimed at reclaiming over 2,800 bighas of forest land along the Assam–Mizoram border. 

While 522 families were first identified for eviction, several households vacated voluntarily after receiving eviction notices, bringing down the number of affected families to 516.

According to the Forest Department officials, the total eviction area was divided into seven sectors, targeting six forest villages, including Purba Damcherra, Madhya Damcherra, and Ujan Damcherra. On the first day, authorities cleared Sectors 5, 6, and 7, affecting over 150 families. The remaining sectors are expected to be cleared in the next phase.

To maintain public order, Hailakandi District Commissioner imposed Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) across the district until 5 February 2026. To prevent potential disturbances, the administration also barred political leaders and party workers from entering the eviction sites.

Hailakandi Divisional Forest Officer Akhil Dutta stated the eviction is being conducted according to legal protocols. "Some residents submitted documents, but none could establish legal possession of reserved forest land. The Gauhati High Court granted them ten days to present their case, but they again produced the same documents, which were not found valid,” Dutta stated.

Dutta also clarified that while Hailakandi contains two reserved forests—Katakhal and Gharumara Inner Line—encroachments were specifically found in the latter.

Officials noted that the forest land had been illegally occupied for years, mainly for housing and for the cultivation of betel nut and areca nut. However, the drive has drawn concern from the locals. Saleh Ahmed Mazumder, a social worker with the SM Humanity Educational Foundation, claimed that some families have lived on the land since 1965. Additionally, Katlicherra MLA Suzam Uddin Laskar appealed for public support for the displaced families.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Administration of Hailakandi; Assam Police; Assam Forest Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us