Maharashtra
,
Aarey Colony
,
Mumbai
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
May 15, 2025
Despite protests, Aarey metro car shed nears completion
Reported by
Prerna Chaurashe
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
10000
People affected
2011
Year started
30
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2011
Year started
30
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Despite a long battle fought by environmental activists and local people to save what is known as Mumbai's 'green lung', the car shed construction in Aarey is nearing completion with 95 percent of the work already finished.

The controversy, which had simmered for over a decade, saw a reversal of earlier decisions when the BJP-led government returned to power in Maharashtra in 2022 after a political split in the ruling Shiv Sena. Soon after forming the government, it reversed the previous administration’s decision to shift the car shed to Kanjurmarg and reinstated the original site in Aarey for construction. On 11 October 2020, Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray had declared that the car shed would be shifted out of Aarey forests and would be built on government land in Kanjurmarg in central Mumbai. The chief minister had also directed the police to withdraw all cases filed against Aarey protestors.

Although the government declared 25% of Aarey forest as reserved forest in 2022, it excluded the car shed site from this declaration. Environmental activists argued this partial protection was insufficient to safeguard the area’s biodiversity and the rights of its indigenous communities.

Aarey Colony is home to a large number of tribespeople, who have lived in the area for generations and run cowsheds that supply milk to a government-run dairy. They have been opposing the metro car shed since it was proposed in 2011. They claimed that construction activity had destroyed a portion of wetlands in the area, which is crucial for streams to flow. Aarey is the catchment area of the Mithi river. Environmental experts too warned that any construction in the area could cause flooding.

Work on the depot had originally begun in 2015, only to be halted by the Supreme Court in October 2019 following a public outcry over the felling of over 2,700 trees. Despite the court's stay, substantial damage had already occurred by the time of its order, following an earlier order of the Bombay High Court that allowed the felling of trees. On 8 October 2019, local tribal communities held a symbolic funeral for the lost trees and displaced wildlife.

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) had announced the 20-km-long Colaba-Bandra Metro Line in January 2004. The plan encompassed 146 kilometres of railway track, of which 32 kilometres was to be underground. In 2011, the MMRDA proposed to extend the Metro Line. A car shed was proposed on 33 hectares as part of the expansion. But following protests by the residents, the area for the car shed was scaled down to 20.82 hectares.

After the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) declared Aarey Colony an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ), the state government considered a private plot at Royal Palms, a residential project of Royal Palms India, according to the managing director of the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation. However, this, too, has been opposed by the residents as Royal Palms is situated inside Aarey Colony and is, therefore, a part of the ESZ.

On 15 April 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the application filed by social activist Amrita P Bhattacharjee challenging Aarey Colony as the site for the metro line. While dismissing the petition, the court referred to the report of the Technical Committee on the feasibility of the metro depot in Aarey Colony.

In September 2019, the MMRDA announced its plan to acquire 29,869 square feet of Aarey forest for a site office, labour camp and casting yard for the Andheri-Kanjurmarg Metro Line 3. The state government had given permission for the land acquisition, but after mass public protests, the MMRDA shelved its plan to acquire land in Aarey and decided to take up a plot of land in Wadala to build the casting yard. The MMRDA came under flak from local people, green activists and celebrities alike, who joined hands for the Save Aarey campaign.

Earlier in 2016, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) had upheld the MoEFCC's decision to reduce the size of land for development purpose to 407 acres - roughly the size of 18 Oval cricket grounds - from the entire 15,000 acres of land in Aarey notified as ESZ. The ministry justified the reduced ESZ and said that the Metro car shed would be built in the excluded zone. Mumbai-based non-profit Vanashakti had challenged this decision in the Supreme Court. On 16 June 2020, the apex court dismissed the plea, observing that "Mumbai was a congested city and Metro is important".

The 25-acre car shed at Aarey would serve as the base for maintaining metro coaches for Mumbai Metro Line 3. The 33.5-km long Metro-3 running along Colaba-Bandra-SEEPZ is the first underground metro corridor of Mumbai. With an estimated project cost of Rs 33,000 crore, the project has received funding from several entities, including Japan's technical and lending agency, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

328

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2015

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

October, 2020

Why did the conflict end?

On October 11, 2020, Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray declared that the car shed would be moved out of Aarey forests to government land in Kanjurmarg in central Mumbai. The chief minister also directed the police to withdraw all cases filed against Aarey protesters.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation (MMRC), Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents of Aarey Colony

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Prerna Chaurashe


Show more work
Latest updates
Ahmedabad
Gujarat

Ahmedabad civic body demolishes 292 illegal structures in Makarba, residents demand rehabilitation

Kachchh
Gujarat

Locals oppose GHCL's chemical plant project in Gujarat's Bada village

Karbi Anglong
Assam

Tribals demand cancellation of multiple corporate projects in Karbi Anglong

Morigaon
Assam

Assam villagers fight to save Hatiutha Hill from granite mining

Surat
Gujarat

Dispute erupts after officials demolish alleged encroachment by Jumma Masjid Trust in Surat

East Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Locals demand relocation of silicon factory in East Siang citing pollution concerns

Nalbari
Assam

Nalbari locals raise environmental concerns over brick kiln, stone crusher operations in Pagladiya river

East Godavari
Andhra Pradesh

Polavaram irrigation project affected families in Andhra Pradesh still awaiting rehabilitation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us