Arunachal Pradesh
,
Namchik East and West
,
Changlang
Published :
May 2025
|
Updated :
Tribals protest against Namchik coal mining auction in Arunachal Pradesh
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
500
Households affected
3000
People affected
2025
Year started
600
ha.
Land area affected
500
Households affected
3000
People Affected
2025
Year started
600
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 17 February 2025, [thousands of indigenous people ](\“The displacement of our people is not an option. We will not allow our ancestral lands to be sacrificed for commercial mining. The government must respect our rights and put an end to this auction,\” declared an IPLLC representative. )from Longtom-I and II, Panchun, and Injan in Kharsang protested against the auction of the Namchik East and West coal mining projects.

The demonstration, organized by the Injan, Panchun, Longtom-I, and Longtom-II Committee (IPLLC), ended with a memorandum being submitted to the Chief Minister.

The Namchik East and West coal blocks, part of the Namchik-Namphuk coalfield, contain an estimated 45.802 million tonnes of coal across 600 hectares. The auction began on 3 February 2024 and ended on 3 March.

During the protest, demonstrators raised concerned over open-cast coal mining as it would displace about 3,000 residents from the Tangsa communities. They demanded the government to cancel the auction and end large-scale mining in these sensitive areas. They further accused the government of ignoring standard procedures by conducting the auction without consulting the affected communities or getting their consent. They claimed that the Union Ministry of Coal gave inaccurate information by not including the actual number of households that would be affected.

“The proposed open-cast coal mining project, covering approximately 600.07 hectares, is expected to directly impact thousands of residents. We fear this project will not only displace communities but also alter the region’s demographic and ecological balance in the long run,” said IPLLC President Semkhum Tonglim.

He pointed out that Longtom-I and II, established before India’s independence, are in an unclassified state forest and support over 160 households of more than 1,000 people. Tonglim also claimed that their displacement would violate the constitutional rights and the Forest Rights Act of 2006, and the Forest (Conservation) Act of 1980.

Additionally, protesters accused the Geology and Mining Department of conducting exploratory activities in Namchik West from 2022 to 2023 without getting consent from local communities. This, they argued, violated the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which requires free and informed consent before starting commercial activities on indigenous land.

Protesters fear that open-cast coal mining could cause serious environmental damage, which can lead to deforestation, loss of farmland, and pollution of air and water. They argued that mining would harm local tea and areca nut plantations, paddy fields, and other forest resources.

As the government intend to go ahead with the plan, IPLLC is adamant to continue opposing the project.

On 8 April 2025, the Ministry of Coal signed Coal Mine Development and Production Agreements (CMDPAs) with PRA Nuravi Coal Mining Private Limited, which emerged as the successful bidder for Namchik West coalfield. The ministry highlighted that the block would create direct and indirect job opportunities, contributing to the socio-economic development of the region.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Coal, Government of India; Directorate of Geology and Mining, Arunachal Pradesh; Office of the District Commissioner, Changlang

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Injan, Panchun, Longtom-I, and Longtom-II Committee (IPLLC)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Show more work
Latest updates
Ahmedabad
Gujarat

Ahmedabad civic body demolishes 292 illegal structures in Makarba, residents demand rehabilitation

Kachchh
Gujarat

Locals oppose GHCL's chemical plant project in Gujarat's Bada village

Karbi Anglong
Assam

Tribals demand cancellation of multiple corporate projects in Karbi Anglong

Morigaon
Assam

Assam villagers fight to save Hatiutha Hill from granite mining

Surat
Gujarat

Dispute erupts after officials demolish alleged encroachment by Jumma Masjid Trust in Surat

East Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Locals demand relocation of silicon factory in East Siang citing pollution concerns

Nalbari
Assam

Nalbari locals raise environmental concerns over brick kiln, stone crusher operations in Pagladiya river

East Godavari
Andhra Pradesh

Polavaram irrigation project affected families in Andhra Pradesh still awaiting rehabilitation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us