Tamil Nadu
Pulicat
,
Kattupalli
,
Thiruvallur
Published :
Jan 2020
|
Updated :
June 21, 2022
Proposed expansion of Kattupalli Port in Tamil Nadu threatens livelihood of fisherfolk
Reported by
Faizi Ahmad
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
33000
People affected
2019
Year started
2473
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
33000
People Affected
2019
Year started
2473
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Port
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Port
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Adani Group has invested Rs 53,031 crore in the Kattupalli Port on the outskirts of Chennai to expand its existing capacity. The fisherfolk in the area have opposed the move citing a threat to their livelihood and have demanded scrapping of the project. The Kattupalli Port was initially built and owned by Larsen and Toubro. Adani Ports acquired it in June 2018 and renamed it Adani Katupalli Port Private Limited.

The port has been spilling oil into the sea since it started operations in January 2012. Now, “expansion operations will require further reclamation of the sea, resulting in more oil spill. This will force the fisherfolk to go for deep-sea fishing, which many of them cannot afford. The project will also displace around 33,000 people, and, if the ecosystem is affected, it might pose a threat to Chennai's groundwater as well,” Xavier Benedict told Land Conflict Watch. Benedict works with the AARDE Foundation, which works for the promotion and conservation of wetlands.

According to a news report, thousands of families depend on fishing in the sea and backwaters in the proposed expansion area. They fear that their relocation will affect their livelihood as they would have to spend more time to commute to the seashore. 

People and activists have also opposed the port expansion on environmental grounds. The proposed expansion work requires reclamation of 2,000 acres of land inside the sea and its adjoining areas, including Ennore-Pulicat backwaters, which Adani plans to do by dumping dredged sand from the Palar river. The backwaters and wetlands play a pivotal role in protecting their surrounding area from floods. The filling up of these natural bodies will expose most parts of North Chennai and its neighbouring areas to floods.

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change granted the Terms of Reference for the expansion of the port in July 2019 after a three-member team appointed by the ministry’s Environment Assessment Committee submitted its report to the Expert Appraisal Committee in June. But the expansion has been in limbo after a public hearing on the proposal was indefinitely postponed owing to Covid-19. The company has not filed a fresh application for a public hearing so far, according to activists.

On 31 January 2022, Pulicat fishers staged a protest seeking permanent jobs at the port as their traditional fishing activities have been badly hit because of the Kamarajar and Adani ports. They also sought the scrapping of the Kattupalli port expansion plan.
 
Speaking to LCW, environmental activist Nityanand Jayaraman, who has been at the forefront of the campaign against the project, said, "If the government wants to revoke the no-objection certificate, it can do so based on the fact that the coastal area is fast eroding. But why the government has not done this is not clear".

Public resistance intensified after the Thiruvallur District Administration postponed a public hearing on the expansion, scheduled for 5 September 2023, due to mounting pressure.

In July 2024, the state government initiated the claim settlement process for final notification of Pulicat bird sanctuary. However, it was unclear whether 13 villages, currently falling within the sanctuary limits, will be included or excluded. The decision will have direct bearing on expansion of industrial projects, especially the contentious Adani-Kattupalli port.

Yuvan Aves, an environmental activist based out of Chennai, told LCW that the proposed expansion will erode the sand barrier islands that protect Pulicat from merging into the Bay of Bengal. This would eliminate the natural barriers that protect the area from cyclones and other adverse climate events. He added that the expansion will further narrow the mouth of the River Kosasthalaiyar, which is Chennai's main natural drain. Thereby, increasing the risk of flooding in the city.

Fisherfolk and environmentalists argue that the expansion would devastate local ecosystems and endanger livelihoods, creating a potential social and environmental disaster. The fishing hamlet of Pulicat, located near the proposed site, stands at the heart of the resistance. Environmentalists emphasize that North Chennai and Thiruvallur districts, which already host oil refineries and thermal power plants, are ecologically fragile. The adjacent Pulicat Bird Sanctuary, a protected area, also faces threats from the proposed expansion.

The fishing community in Pulicat, home to over 100,000 people, has vowed to continue its fight, with four village panchayats already passing resolutions against the project. Fisherfolk plan to coordinate protests, demanding the cancellation of the expansion.

Neither the Tamil Nadu government nor Adani Ports has issued an official response, although a source from Adani Ports indicated that the eventual public hearing would aim to address public concerns through state-run regulators.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Scrapping of the project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

53000

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Adani Ports and SEZ Ltd

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Fisherfolk, environmental activists, AARDE Foundation

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Faizi Ahmad

Faizi is a data journalist and researcher interested in the environment, rural development and livelihoods. He currently works with The India Forum and has previously worked with IndiaSpend, The Hindu and The Week.

Show more work
Latest updates
Bharuch
Gujarat

Farmers protest against GIDC in Gujarat, demand promised jobs, compensation

Dima Hasao
Assam

Locals in Assam's Dima Hasao threaten to halt mining operations

Ukhrul
Manipur

Boundary dispute leads to violent clash in Manipur's Ukhrul

Cachar
Assam

Bharatmala project evictees in Silchar's Rongpur stage protest, seek compensation

Morigaon
Assam

NGT orders probe into industrial encroachment near Assam's Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary

Palghar
Maharashtra

8,000 residents evicted as civic body targets 41 illegal buildings in Nalasopara

Goalpara
Assam

450 families evicted from Bandarmatha reserve forest in Assam to reduce man-elephant conflict

Tiruchirappalli
Tamil Nadu

Farmers oppose Trichy airport expansion project

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us