In Arunachal Pradesh, a substantial conflict has emerged over the proposed development of 12 hydropower projects with a cumulative capacity of 11,523 MW, allocated to PSUs such as North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd (NEEPCO) (2,620 MW), Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd (SJVN) (5,097 MW), and National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) (3,800 MW). Indigenous communities, particularly the Adi tribe from the Siang, Upper Siang, East Siang, West Siang, and Dibang Valley districts, have opposed these projects due to concerns about land submersion, environmental degradation, and cultural loss.
While the Tato-II HEP (700 MW), the Tato-I HEP (186 MW), the Heo HEP (240 MW), the Naying HEP (1,000 MW) and the Hirong HEP (500 MW) have been allotted to the NEEPCO, the Etalin HEP (3,097 MW), the Attunli HEP (680 MW), the Emini HEP (500 MW), the Amulin HEP (420 MW) and the Mihumdon HEP (400 MW) have been given to the SJVN. The Subansiri Upper HEP (2,000 MW) and the Subansiri Middle (Kamala) HEP (1,800 MW) have been allotted to the NHPC.
These projects were earlier entrusted upon private sector developers about 15 years ago, but they remained non-starters due to myriad of reasons. The state government, therefore, decided to rope in central hydro PSUs to give a push to the languishing projects.
On 12 August 2023, Arunachal Pradesh’s Power Commissioner, Ankur Garg, signed the agreements with the heads of the three CPSUs on behalf of the state government in Itanagar in the presence of Power and New and Renewable Energy Minister, R K Singh, State Chief Minister Pema Khandu, and his Deputy CM Chowna Mein.
Protesters voiced strong opposition to the government's plans, claiming a lack of consent, consultation, and warning of the disastrous consequences of such large hydropower projects, particularly a proposed 10,000 MW dam on the Siang River. They argue that these developments threaten both their land and ecological balance.
Water resources experts said that the 12 power projects in Arunachal Pradesh that were officially handed over to three Central public sector undertakings (CPSUs) on August 12 are "economically unviable".
A significant rally took place on 14 September 2023, in Geku Village, where over 7,000 attendees pledged against the Siang Dam, led by local priests. An Assam-based hydrologist, who did not want to be named, said these projects should not have been taken up in the first place. “Apart from being unviable, these guarantee disaster for Arunachal Pradesh and downstream regions in Assam,” he said.
Despite the protests, the government is committed to the projects. Manohar Lal, Union Minister of Power and Housing & Urban Affairs, on 8 July 2024, during his visit highlighted that Arunachal Pradesh has about 38 percent (about 50 GW) of India’s total hydropower potential. On the same day, activist lawyer Ebo Mili and Siang Indigenous Farmers’ Forum (SIFF) convener Dunge Apang were detained by the state government. They were released after over 10 hours of detention after signing a Rs 50,000 bond to keep peace until one year or the completion of ongoing inquiry.
On 23 May 2025, protests erupted in Beging village, Siang district, against the deployment of 100 Central Armed Police Force personnel for a pre-feasibility survey related to the SUMP. Villagers burned a hanging bridge to block access and demanded the removal of armed forces and drilling equipment. A few days later, the Ekhomey Mowo Welfare Society in Dibang Valley opposed the 400 MW Mihundo Hydroelectric Project, citing a lack of free, prior, and informed consent.
On 14 July 2025, over 1,000 villagers rallied in Geku, Upper Siang, reinforcing their opposition to the 11,000–12,500 MW SUMP. The Siang Indigenous Farmers’ Forum (SIFF) vowed to continue peaceful protests until the project is canceled.
Meanwhile, the Arunachal Pradesh government, under Chief Minister Pema Khandu, has declared 2025–2035 the "Decade of Hydropower," aiming to generate 58,000 MW with investments exceeding Rs 2 lakh crore. The government justifies these projects as vital for national interests, particularly to counter China’s upstream dams on the Yarlung Tsangpo River. However, Khandu has publicly stated that projects like the SUMP will not proceed without local consent.
Local communities fear the submersion of fertile lands, villages, and sacred sites, alongside environmental risks in a seismically active region rich in biodiversity. Rights groups, including Manipur’s Centre for Research and Advocacy, have condemned the government’s actions, particularly the detention of activists like Ebo Mili, as violations of indigenous rights, according to The Hindu.
“The deputy commissioner of Siang asked us not to oppose the dam,” said Tarok Siram, the headman of Parong village. “I told him to take the opinion of 116 families in my village. I pointed out that the homes of 43 families will be under waterif the dam is built here. The remaining families will have to be relocated.”
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand to cancel the project
Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources
Refusal to give up land for the project
Complaint against procedural violations
Opposition against environmental degradation
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Common
Forest and Non-Forest
What was the action taken by the police?
Detention
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
4
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from detention
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
No
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
Yes, they were produced within 24 hours
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 107
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
Yes they were informed, Yes they had access
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Yes
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project underway despite protests
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
No
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Other environmental services, Water bodies, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
No
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
126000
Type of investment:
Investment Expected
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
No
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Non-consultation with stakeholders
Legal Status:
Out of Court
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
No
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Case Number
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Arrest/detention/imprisonment
Judicial harassment
Other harassment
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Yes
Reported Details of the Violation:
In March 2022, police in Arunachal Pradesh detained lawyer Ebo Mili and Assam-based artist Nilim Mahanta for their role in defacing government property. The two had been arrested for painting the words “No more dams” and a protest fist on the boundary wall of the state civil secretariat in the capital, Itanagar. In August 2023, anti-dam activist and advocate Ebo Mili, along with one Mejo Mihu were detained by the capital police for staging a peaceful protest outside the banquet hall in Itanagar. They were interrogated for hours and were reportedly forced by the police to sign a bond and they were later taken to the ICR deputy commissioner’s office. Mili’s colleague reported that they made them stand for hours at the police station and unnecessarily harassed them. On 8 July 2024, activist lawyer Ebo Mili and Siang Indigenous Farmers’ Forum (SIFF) convener Dunge Apang were detained by the State Govt. They were released after more than 10 hours of detention. In May 2025, a First Information Report (FIR) was filed against Ebo Mili for provoking resistance. The move was condemned by rights groups as harassment.
Date of Violation
July 7, 2024
Location of Violation
Itanagar
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
National Thermal Power Corporation, Ministry of Power, Government of India, Urban Affairs department
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd (NEEPCO), Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam (SJVN), National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC), HYDRO POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH LIMITED, Office of the Chairman cum Managing Director
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Acheso Atih Welfare Society (AAWA), All Adi welfare society (AAWS), Siang Indigenous Farmer's Forum (SIFF)
What was the action taken by the police?
Detention
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
4
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from detention
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
No
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
Yes, they were produced within 24 hours
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 107
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
Yes they were informed, Yes they had access
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Yes
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?