Himachal Pradesh
Tang Narbaana, Narvaana Khaas and Balla Jadrangal
,
Kand Kardiana village
,
Kangra
Published :
Jul 2019
|
Updated :
September 24, 2024
Himachal government keen on building university without recognising rights of forest dwellers
Reported by
Himdhara Environment Research and Action Collective
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
70
Households affected
1600
People affected
2009
Year started
75
Land area affected
70
Households affected
1600
People Affected
2009
Year started
75
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Education
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Education
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The residents of Kand Kardiana village in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, stare at an uncertain future as the state government has proposed to utilise their land to build a university. The project, proposed in 2009, is to construct the Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUPH) in Dharamshala and Dehra of Kangra district. In Dharamshala, the government plans to acquire approximately 99 hectares of land for constructing the north campus, of which 75.3 Ha is forestland. The area falls under the jurisdiction of four panchayats, Kand Kardiana, Tang Narbaana, Narvaana Khaas and Balla Jadrangal. 

The project would directly affect 70 families in Kand Kardiana panchayat and 45 households in other panchayats, who either have their homes and agricultural fields at the proposed site. The acquisition would impact their livelihoods as they are heavy dependent on the forests.

According to the residents, they were allotted common land as a part of a state policy. In 1975, the state government had notified a scheme to allot nautor land to landless persons to aid them in settling and earning a livelihood. However, later these lands were classified as forestlands and became restricted under the Forest Conservation Act of 1980. Consequently, many persons could not get their plots registered under the official land records. Since then, these families remain labelled as “encroachers”. 

Now, the government wants to take over the land in Kand Kardania to build the university. However, the eviction would leave the families homeless without compensation or rehabilitation. Therefore, they seek recognition of their rights under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006. 

The process of filing claims under the FRA started in 2016. The Sub-Divisional Level Committee (SDLC) rejected the claims in December 2017 on the ground that a No Objection Certificate (NOC) was already given to the government in 2016. But this was done by blatantly ignoring the terms and conditions put forward by the people while granting the NOC. “We have no objection to the construction of the university; all we demand is that our forest rights should not be affected, especially the households that claim Individual Forest Rights”, Desh Raj, a resident of Kand Kardania, told Land Conflict Watch.

In December 2018, the affected persons protested and submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister, as per a news report

In February 2019, the District-Level Committee (DLC), citing a decision taken by the SDLC in another meeting in November 2018, reiterated that there were no claims over the site proposed for the university as the people did not object to the construction. The DLC also ignored the objections raised against its decision by a non-official member of the committee which had recommended recognising the forest rights of the people of Kand Kardiana. With their rights claims getting rejected by both the SDLC and the DLC, the people had no choice but to approach the State Level Monitoring Committee with their grievances, which has directed the SDLC to give an impartial hearing to the case.

The construction of CUHP has been fraught with tension since its inception. Earlier, the university struggled with acquiring a forest clearance due to the environmental concerns raised by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC). The site inspection report pointed towards the topographical unsuitability of the proposed site for construction.  

As per a news report, the land demarcated in Dehra has been given forest clearance now. However, Dharamshala is still not granted the same.

Despite this, the government has been adamant on going ahead with the construction of CUHP. According to a news report, in February 2021, the forest department planned to visit for a site inspection to address the problems. In March, the Union Ministry of Finance approved Rs. 740.79 for the two campus sites. However, the process of land acquisition cannot start in Dharamshala until the forest clearance is accorded. 

Meanwhile, the residents of Kand Kardiana continue to wait for the legal recognition of their forest rights under the FRA.

As on September 2024, the university was still operating out of a temporary campus. In 2023, the MoEF had opposed the construction on the Dharamsala land since it is in Seismic Zone 5, an active landslide and reserve forest land. As of 2023, 115 hectares of land had been handed over to the university.

According to the minutes of the Finance Committee held on 27 March 2023, preliminary construction activities had started. However, forest clearance at Jadrangal (Dharamsala) was still pending.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/himachal/land-acquisition-for-cuhp-to-render-70-families-homeless-707200> <https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/expedite-clearance-for-cuhp-campus-anurag-216641>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

242

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2009

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Himachal Pradesh; Forest Department; State Public Works Department; Department of Education; Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

N/A

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers , Pastoralists/forest dwellers of Gaddi tribe

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Himdhara Environment Research and Action Collective

Himdhara is an autonomous, non-registered environment research and action collective based in Himachal Pradesh, extending solidarity and support, in research and action, to communities and organisations asserting their rights to access, govern and protect their ecological spaces.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/himachal/land-acquisition-for-cuhp-to-render-70-families-homeless-707200> <https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/expedite-clearance-for-cuhp-campus-anurag-216641>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us