Gujarat
Meu, Mulsan, Saldi, Chirthapura, Dharrisana, Devarasan, Gunjala, Charadan , Udalpur , Langhanj , Lakhwad , Dela , Piludara , Chirtsoda , Bamosana, Bhandu, Bhandupura , Laxmipura , Bokarwada among other villages in Mehsana, Banaskantha, Patan, Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad districts.
,
Mehsana
,
Mehsana
Published :
Sep 2024
|
Updated :
Gujarat farmers refuse to give up land for Ahmedabad-Tharad highway
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
2083
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2024
Year started
1918
Land area affected
2083
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2024
Year started
1918
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In August 2024, the Union Cabinet approved Rs 10,534 crore for the construction of a six-lane, access-controlled national high-speed corridor that will extend 214 kilometers from Ahmedabad to Tharad. This ambitious infrastructure project, designed to slash travel time between the two cities from six hours to a mere three, is set to pass through five key districts in Gujarat: Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Mehsana, Patan, and Banaskantha. However, the project has ignited significant controversy, especially among the region's farming communities, due to the extensive land acquisition involved.

According to a report by the Gujarat Samachar, approximately 1,300 hectares of land will be acquired from local farmers to facilitate the construction of the highway. This land, much of it fertile agricultural land, will be converted into roadway, leading to concerns about the potential impact on crop production and the livelihoods of farmers. The loss of such a large amount of productive farmland has sparked fears that many farmers will be forced to transition from landowners to farm labourers, fundamentally altering the rural landscape of the region.

The first signs of unrest appeared in July 2022, when farmers in Mehsana district, one of the areas most affected by the project, began to organize protests against the land acquisition. Approximately 40 villages in the district participated in a rally held in Mehsana town, where farmers submitted a petition to the district collector outlining 11 key issues they wanted resolved. Among their demands were calls for a resurvey of the land to minimize acquisition, alignment changes to protect more farmland, and the implementation of a Minimum Support Price in the Land Acquisition Act. The farmers also expressed concern that the expressway would disrupt the local topography, particularly by damaging the Sujlam Suflam Canal, a vital irrigation source.

The protests in Mehsana were just the beginning of a broader movement against the project. By October 2022, the discontent had spread to Gandhinagar, where a large group of farmers staged a sit-in protest at the Satyagraha camp. The farmers, many of whom were directly affected by the land acquisition, gathered to voice their opposition to the Bharatmala project, which includes the Ahmedabad-Tharad expressway. The protestors, armed with banners and slogans, were resolute in their demands, with some even resorting to hunger strikes in an effort to halt the project.

The resistance reached a new peak in April 2024, when over 100 individuals gathered at the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters in Gandhinagar to stage a protest against the highway project. This protest, organized under the banner of the 'Asargrast Khedut Samanvay Samiti,' saw the farmers reiterate their opposition to the land acquisition. The protesters declared their determination to protect their land, stating that they were willing to sacrifice their lives rather than surrender their property for the highway.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to implement MSP (Minimum Support Price) in Land Acquisition Act.

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

10534

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2024

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Suchak Patel

Show more work
Latest updates
Devbhoomi Dwarka
Gujarat

2,754 Gujarat Villages without Grazing Land, Residents Allege Forceful Acquisition by State

Ahmedabad
Gujarat

AMC Provides Rehabilitation to Street Vendors in Ahmedabad Following Protests Against Eviction

Bhavnagar
Gujarat

Farmers Oppose Limestone Mining on Fertile Land in Gujarat's Bhavnagar District

Junagadh
Gujarat

Relocated Maldharis Return to Gujarat's Gir Park, at Loggerheads with Forest Department

South Delhi
Delhi

Delhi Development Authority Demolishes Slum in Batla House, 800 Families Left Homeless

Jamnagar
Gujarat

Essar Port Threat to Mangroves, Livelihood of Fisherfolk in Gujarat

Surat
Gujarat

Fisherfolk Fear Livelihood Loss as Industry Body Plans Textile Park in Surat

Kutch
Gujarat

Agariya Farmers in Gujarat Demand Seasonal Land Rights, Minimum Support Price for Salt

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us