On 11 August 2025, the Punjab government withdrew the Land Pooling Policy (LLP) 2025, which it had introduced earlier in June. Under the LPP 2025, the state government had planned to acquire 65,000 acres of land across 165 villages and 27 cities in Punjab for industrial and residential development. However, this move by the government saw protests from farmers’ groups and landowners across the state. Following the protests, on 7 August 2025, the Punjab and Haryana High Court stayed the policy, citing that the state had not conducted a Social Impact Assessment or an Environmental Impact Assessment before carrying out its proposed development work. Four days after the court’s order, the government scrapped the policy.
While introducing the Land Pooling Policy 2025, the Punjab government had stated that the Department of Housing and Urban Development aims to create “well planned urban estates” by “consolidating fragments of land parcels.” The government further stated that under the policy, farmers and landowners can opt to pool their land, and they will later receive 1,000 square yards of residential land and 200 square yards of commercial land in developed zones in exchange for each acre pooled. The rest of the land will be used for infrastructural development.
The policy also said that an amount of Rs 50,000 will be offered against a letter of intent for land pooling, along with an annual allowance of 1 lakh rupees with regular yearly increments. The government also said that the land acquisitions under the LPP 2025 will be carried out following the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
As soon as the policy was introduced, it faced backlash from farmers, landholders, farm leaders, and other political leaders from within the opposition, as well as within the AAP government in Punjab led by Bhagwat Mann. Leader of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha termed the policy a “major conspiracy.” According to a report by The New Indian Express, the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM), comprising 35 farm unions, had given a call for tractor marches, which got support from other farm unions, including the Kisan Majdoor Morcha (KMM) and BKU Ekta-Ugrahan.
Tractor marches were taken out in various parts of the state, including Ludhiana, Amritsar, Sangrur, Mohali, Bathinda, Taran Taran, Patiala, Ferozepur, Fategarh Sahib, Ropar, Jalandhar, SBS Nagar, Hoshiarpur, Moga and Mansa districts. "It was the biggest-ever march in recent times, as the public in rural areas showed their anger against the government’s bid to take over their fertile lands and displace them from their homes. This policy will ruin at least 20,000 families of farmers and leave farm labourers jobless," president of BKU (Rajewal Group) Balbir Singh Rajewal told The New Indian Express.
On 7 August 2025, a petition was filed by a resident of Ludhiana challenging the move to earmark 26,000 acres of land for the setting up of residential and commercial projects. The petitioner argued that the policy was “arbitrary” and “irrational” and had been proposed without carrying out the necessary environmental and social impact assessment, which is an essential prerequisite for the acquisition of land under Sections 4 to 8 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It was also argued that the policy has no provision for providing compensation at the time of acquisition, and only an annual livelihood allowance of Rs 50,000 per acre would be paid, but it would be too meagre for the sustenance of families of small and marginal farmers. The petition also argued that under the policy, the land acquired would not be through voluntary pooling but also would be forcefully acquired by the state under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court put an interim stay on the LPP 2025. “The policy appears to have been notified in haste and all concerns, including social impact assessment, environmental impact assessment, timelines and redressal grievance mechanism, should have been addressed at the very outset in the policy, before its notification,” the court said. “As an interim measure, lest any rights are created, the impugned Land Pooling Policy, 2025, notified on 14.05.2025 and 04.06.2025, and subsequently amended on 25.07.2025, shall remain stayed,” the court ordered.
A few days later, the Punjab government, through an official notification, withdrew the Land Pooling Policy 2025. In a statement, the principal secretary, Housing and Urban Development, said, “The government hereby withdraws the Land Pooling Policy dated May 14, 2025, and its subsequent amendments. Consequently, all actions, like LOIs issued, registration done, or any other action taken thereunder, shall be reversed henceforth.” Farmers and several organisation hailed it as a victory.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand to cancel the project
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Type of Land
Private
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project scrapped
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Agricultural land
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Yes
Source/Reference
Under sustained pressure from farmers, the Punjab Government has formally scrapped its controversial Land Pooling Policy 2025. <https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/faced-with-farmers-backlash-punjab-scraps-controversial-land-pooling-policy/ar-AA1KxNEt?apiversion=v2&noservercache=1&domshim=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1&batchservertelemetry=1&noservertelemetry=1>
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
Yes
When did it end?
August 2025
Why did the conflict end?
The Punjab government, through an official notification, withdrew the Land Pooling Policy 2025.
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Land Acquisition Laws
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Violation of environmental laws
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Disposed
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Case Number
CWP-20261-2025
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
Date of Violation
Location of Violation
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Government of Punjab, Department of Housing and Urban Development
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Samyukt Kisan Morcha; Kisan Majdoor Morcha; BKU Ekta-Ugrahan
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?