Gujarat
,
Palanpur
,
Banaskantha
Published :
Apr 2024
|
Updated :
August 21, 2024
Farmers demand reduction in land proposed for acquisition for Palanpur bypass in Gujarat
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Farmers of 15 villages in Palanpur area of Gujarat's Banaskantha district have opposed the proposed land acquisition for a bypass road to alleviate the escalating traffic congestion at Aroma Circle.

The government proposed to acquire 100-metre wide land for the 25-kilometre Palanpur Highway Circle Bypass. However, this initiative threatens the livelihoods of approximately 50 farmers. Opposing the move, the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh (BKS) on 2 April 2024, submitted a grievance letter to the Collector, urging a reduction in the land acquisition width to 30 meters.

Meanwhile, BKS leader for Banaskantha, Mavjibhai Loh, highlighted the disparity in land acquisition between projects has fuelled discontent among local residents and stakeholders. He pointed out that the six-lane Bharatmala project road from Gandhinagar to Dhanera necessitated only a 60-meter wide land for acquisition, whereas 100-metre wide land has been proposed for the Palanpur bypass.

In the letter, the organisation requested the Gujarat government to reduce the proposed land acquisition for the bypass so that the affected farmers can use the remaining land for animal husbandry to sustain their lives.

During a protest, farmers said that the initial proposal suggested a plan to build a 30-metre wide road, which would have affected farmers in 10 villages. However, the Roads & Buildings (R&B) Department contended that no prior map was prepared for the project.

Loh warned that farmers would stage protests if the government fails to make decisions in the farmers' best interests.

An estimated budget of Rs 380 crore was approved for the bypass.

In August 2024, leaders from 15 affected villages convened in Khodal village, Palanpur, and issued a stern warning to initiate a protest if their demands were not met. The farmers are not against the bypass road itself but are contesting the government’s move to acquire 60 meters to 100 meters of land when only 30 meters is needed. They argue that the excessive land acquisition will unduly impact their livelihoods.

According to a report by the Bhaksar, the farmers allege that the initial survey targeted land from 1,200 farmers across 10 villages, which was subsequently canceled. A new survey was then conducted, reportedly favouring builders and politicians, resulting in the acquisition of land from 2,000 farmers spanning 20 villages. This new survey also encompasses 700 borewells, further exacerbating the farmers' concerns.

Aniketbhai Thakar, MLA of Palanpur, acknowledged the farmers' grievances, stating that while they do not oppose the bypass road, they believe too much land is being taken. He assured that efforts would be made to find a fair solution and that the issue would be presented to the government for resolution.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to modify the project

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Suchak Patel

Show more work
Latest updates
Devbhoomi Dwarka
Gujarat

2,754 Gujarat Villages without Grazing Land, Residents Allege Forceful Acquisition by State

Ahmedabad
Gujarat

AMC Provides Rehabilitation to Street Vendors in Ahmedabad Following Protests Against Eviction

Bhavnagar
Gujarat

Farmers Oppose Limestone Mining on Fertile Land in Gujarat's Bhavnagar District

Junagadh
Gujarat

Relocated Maldharis Return to Gujarat's Gir Park, at Loggerheads with Forest Department

South Delhi
Delhi

Delhi Development Authority Demolishes Slum in Batla House, 800 Families Left Homeless

Jamnagar
Gujarat

Essar Port Threat to Mangroves, Livelihood of Fisherfolk in Gujarat

Surat
Gujarat

Fisherfolk Fear Livelihood Loss as Industry Body Plans Textile Park in Surat

Kutch
Gujarat

Agariya Farmers in Gujarat Demand Seasonal Land Rights, Minimum Support Price for Salt

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us