Maharashtra
,
Entire stretch of Mula, Mutha and Mula-Mutha rivers
,
Pune
Published :
Mar 2022
|
Updated :
February 10, 2025
Environmentalists oppose Pune riverfront development project citing degradation of Mula-Mutha rivers
Reported by
Anjali Dalmia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2016
Year started
73
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2016
Year started
73
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

In early 2016, the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) proposed the Pune Riverfront Development Project along the length and breadth of the Mula-Mutha rivers. The 44-kilometre-long Mula, Mutha and Mula-Mutha rivers** (the **latter is formed by the confluence of the Mula and Mutha rivers) flowing within the PMC limits are set to undergo a ‘rejuvenation’ under the beautification project, costing Rs 4,727 crore. The Detailed Project Report states that the main objective is to clean the rivers and reduce flooding.

The project will require channelising and converting the two rivers into canals by constructing 30-40-feet-high concrete or stone embankments along their length. Additionally, barrages will be built on all three rivers near Garware College, Kaspate Vasti (Cantonment) and Mundhwa K.T. Weir.

Environmentalists and the Water Resources Department (WRD) have expressed concern. The WRD said, “While implementing the Riverfront Development Project on Mula, Mutha and Mula-Mutha rivers, care should be taken to not reduce the cross-section of the rivers.” However, the PMC seems to have ignored this advice as the project will allegedly narrow down the rivers in the process of building embankments, which will require land reclamation from the riverbed or floodplains. This, in turn, will affect groundwater aquifers and the city’s watertable. The barrages being built will cause the water, which is already sewage water, to stagnate and flow back into the streams, resulting in mosquito infestation. It will also lower the levels of dissolved oxygen and impact the last two remaining fish species (Mangur and Tilapia) in the rivers.
 
The Environmental Clearance for the project was also controversial and was allegedly rushed by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). A report by the South Asian Network on Dams, Rivers and People claimed that the SEIAA ignored the basic elements of the project, such as according clearance in the absence of barrage experts in the committee. The assessment report also allegedly denied any form of demolition of houses along the rivers. Essentially, the project will not clean the rivers; instead, it will irreversibly destroy the rivers’ biodiversity and ecology, deplete groundwater table, make bridges and roads inaccessible** **and cause flooding and land submersion.
 
Environmentalists and civic activists have raised the issues with the WRD, but has not got any response so far. Some activists have petitioned the National Green Tribunal and the Bombay high court against the irregularities of the project. Despite the opposition, in October 2021, the PMC floated a tender worth INR 360 crore for the first phase of the project from Sangam Ghat to Bund Garden.
 
An Appeal was filed in 2020 by Pune-based Architect Sarang Yadwadkar along with Pushkar Kulkarni against the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to the project. The Appeal was premised on several grounds such as absence of any scientific study of the Mula, Mutha and Mula-Mutha Rivers, their biodiversity or the ecology of Pune, reduction in the cross section of the river, prohibition on construction in blue line of the river, etc. The Appeal also alleged that the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) has failed to appraise component of the construction of barrages due to the lack of expertise with SEAC and yet allowed the project in violation of the order of the Supreme Court.

In its judgment dated 29 November 2022, the NGT held that there was a failure of the SEAC to apply its mind during the process of grant of EC, and that “even EIA report prepared by the Consultant and argued to be appraised by the SEAC/SEIAA, does not provide any details of various activities proposed to be undertaken as a part of the project”. However, despite the observed violations, the NGT disposed of the Appeal, saying, “as this is public interest project, the PP has carried out all required studies, and SEAC/SEIAA have duly apprised the proposal before recommending/granting EC”. The NGT did however direct the PMC to obtain an amended EC from the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) factoring in certain additional safeguards.

During the pendency of approval of amended EC, on 27 March 2023, the Supreme Court adjudicated on an Appeal filed against the NGT Judgment of 29 November 2022. A Division Bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice M M Sundresh recorded in their order that they did not “find any good ground and reason to interfere” with the judgment of the NGT, and accordingly the Appeal was dismissed. However, the Apex Court added that the Appellants were free to raise pleas before the NGT if any violations caused by the Pune Municipal Corporation are observed.

Meanwhile, the process of obtaining amended EC continued. On 19 September 2024, the PMC submitted before the NGT that the SEIAA has granted the PMC an amended EC, and accordingly, the matter has now been legally settled. Commenting on the legal proceedings, Sarang Yadwadkar was quoted as saying “We feel this is very unfortunate for Pune and its citizens.” 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4727

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2016

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Pune Municipal Corporation, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

HCP Design, Planning and Management Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Environmentalists, Fridays For Future Pune

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Anjali Dalmia

Anjali is an activist working for intersectional, anti-caste and democratic social and environmental justice. She graduated in Sociology and Anthropology with Environmental Studies from Ashoka University. She is a member of the Yugma Network, a pan-Indian youth initiative working towards achieving ground-level environmental justice through conversations, campaigns, education, art and law. Aditi is also the co-founder of The Project Amara, a Pune and NCR-based initiative to ensure sustainable and equitable menstruation. She loves marine ecology and insects and is particularly interested in working at the intersection of economics, policies, environment and justice.

Show more work
Latest updates
Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Manipur

Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat farmers oppose land acquisition for Kodinar-Somnath railway project

Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Dima Hasao
Assam

Environmental Devastation and Human Fatalities: The Crisis of Illegal Coal Mining in Dima Hasao's Abandoned Mines

South Goa
Goa

In water-stressed Sancoale, locals protest Bhutani project with 700 swimming pools

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat puts solar power project near Gir sanctuary on hold amid protest

Dimapur
Nagaland

Global Naga Forum calls for relocation of Assam Rifles camps from urban areas

Dimapur
Nagaland

DNSU demands relocation of sub-centre in GMC Midland

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us