Assam
,
Dhubri
,
Dhubri
Published :
|
Updated :
Dhubri administration clears over 110 makeshift shops along Brahmaputra; protesters demand rehabilitation
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
110
Households affected
528
People affected
2025
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
110
Households affected
528
People Affected
2025
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

In a crackdown on alleged encroachments, the Dhubri district administration dismantled over 110 makeshift shops in June 2025. This eviction, which took place over several days, came after Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s visit, where he ordered the removal of illegal structures on government land.

The operation targeted areas along the Brahmaputra riverbank in Ward No. 3. Among the cleared sites were 20 shops located opposite the Dhubri District Treasury Office and near the Rajiv Gandhi Children’s Amusement Park, 40 shops surrounding Netai Dhubuni Park, and 50 others at Jogomaya Ghat.

Dhubri Revenue Circle Officer, Partha Pratim Barman, led the eviction and noted that evictions would continue in other areas with illegal encroachments.

District officials have defended the move, stating that the land was unlawfully occupied. Officials claimed that prior notices were given and some shopkeepers left voluntarily, but many left only due to force from the authorities.

The All Assam Minority Students’ Union (AAMSU) organised protests to oppose the evictions in Dhubri and Goalpara. In a memorandum to the Chief Minister, AAMSU accused the government of evicting poor and landless citizens without providing any form of rehabilitation, calling the whole exercise unjust.

During a protest, AAMSU General Secretary Minnatul Islam clarified the union’s stance: “We are not against eviction, but people must first be rehabilitated. Evicting individuals without providing them a place to go is inhumane.” He further alleged that such eviction drives disproportionately target minority communities, particularly Muslims. “This is not governance, this is harassment,” he declared.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Dhubri District Administration;Dhubri Revenue Circle Office;

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All Assam Minority Students’ Union

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for better access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us