Maharashtra
,
Moracha pada
,
Mumbai Suburban
Published :
|
Updated :
Adivasis in Aarey forest fear losing their farmlands to Film City
Reported by
Shubham Kothari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
42
Households affected
201
People affected
2025
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
42
Households affected
201
People Affected
2025
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 6 June 2025, tribal families from Moracha Pada in Mumbai's Aarey, a protected forest, accused Film City authorities of burying thousands of trees and dumping debris on their farmlands in Sultanat valley for the construction of a new film set. The Adivasi farmers claimed that the fields belong to 42 indigenous farming families in the Film City. 

In addition to the damage to trees and crops due to debris, local farmers claimed that soil and stones were dumped into a nearby river, blocking its natural flow, which could cause flooding in several tribal fields. The farmers said that they have they have been using the land for years for farming and the river is crucial for the rest of the farmlands downstream.

The tribals and the Dadabhai Phadke Chittranagari Corporation that manages the film city have been at loggerheads with each other. The tribals had previously complained to the corporation about new film sets encroaching on forest land and debris being dumped on trees. They alleged that a month ago, their fields were cleared for the shooting of a popular TV show without even informing them. The corporation had passed a stop work order to the work on 28 April 2025 after the complaints were filed by the tribals. However, the work resumed, and the adivasis led a protest march on 20 May 2025. They alleged that bouncers hired by Film City prevented them from stopping the work. 

According to a report by the Hindustan Times, around 100 adivasi families live in Moracha Pada, separated from the Film City by a boundary wall. The tribals claim to have been moved out of the Film City decades ago but they continued to use the Sultanat valley inside the Film City for their annual monsoon farming.

Prashant Sajanikar, joint managing director of the Dadasaheb Phalke Chitranagari told the Hindustan Times that the land belongs to Film City and the adivasis do not have documentary proof over the farm lands, which is well within the Film City’s compound. The adivasis, however, claimed that they have been historically tilling the land and had permission from the collector for the same.

“Adivasis here do not have 7/12 documents or 2006 Forest Rights Act papers. But if we have proof that we have been farming here since before 2005, we can file a Van Dava (forest claim) under the Act for farming, fishing, and other rights. This law is there for us,” a resident of Aarey told the Times Now.

The villagers now fear loss of farmlands not just in the valley but also in the downstream area as the Film City's expansion threatens the water flow from a river in the region.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Dadasaheb Phalke Chitranagari Corporation

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shubham Kothari

Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us